Mineral City Construction Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Ronald Lasko
About | Practice Areas
R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC
1406 W 6th St STE 200, Cleveland, OH 44113» view map
Business, Estate, Real Estate, Employment
Competent Legal Representation

Let R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC handle all your legal needs today!

216-574-2602
1. Ronald Lasko Cleveland, OH
  Attorney at Law, OH
  Cleveland-Marshall College of Law, J.D. 1976
2. AboutR. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC
  Competent Legal Representation
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Business Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Includes: Construction Contracts, Construction Liens, Housing & Construction Defects

C. Jason Deeds

Corporate, Health Care Other, Construction, Employee Rights, Trusts

Status:

CONTACT

220 Market Ave S, Canton, OH 44702

Charles Eugene Ringer

Construction, Litigation, Corporate, Personal Injury

Status:

CONTACT

4690 Munson St Nw, Canton, OH 44718

James Allen Desmith

Insurance, Litigation, Construction, Personal Injury, Products Liability

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

3521 Whipple Ave Nw, Canton, OH 44718

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

UNCONSCIONABILITY

A seller's taking advantage of a buyer due to their unequal bargaining positions, perhaps because of the buyer's recent trauma, physical infirmity, ignorance, i... (more...)

A seller's taking advantage of a buyer due to their unequal bargaining positions, perhaps because of the buyer's recent trauma, physical infirmity, ignorance, inability to read or inability to understand the language. The unfairness must be so severe that it is shocking to the average person. It usually includes the absence of any meaningful choice on the part of the buyer and contract terms so one-sided that they unreasonably favor the seller. A contract will be terminated if the buyer can prove unconscionability.

QUASI-COMMUNITY PROPERTY

A form of property owned by a married couple. If a couple moves to a community property state from a non-community property state, property they acquired togeth... (more...)

A form of property owned by a married couple. If a couple moves to a community property state from a non-community property state, property they acquired together in the non-community property state may be considered quasi-community property. Quasi-community property is treated just like community property when one spouse dies or if the couple divorces.

YELLOW-DOG CONTRACT

An employment contract in which the employer forbids the employee to join a labor union. Yellow-dog contracts are not legally enforceable.

MONTH-TO-MONTH TENANCY

A rental agreement that provides for a one-month tenancy that is automatically renewed each month unless either tenant or landlord gives the other the proper am... (more...)

A rental agreement that provides for a one-month tenancy that is automatically renewed each month unless either tenant or landlord gives the other the proper amount of written notice (usually 30 days) to terminate the agreement. Some landlords prefer to use month-to-month tenancies because it gives them the right to raise the rent after giving proper notice. This type of rental also provides a landlord with an easy way to get rid of troublesome tenants, because in most states month-to-month tenancies can be terminated for any reason.

HEIR

One who receives property from someone who has died. While the traditional meaning includes only those who had a legal right to the deceased person's property, ... (more...)

One who receives property from someone who has died. While the traditional meaning includes only those who had a legal right to the deceased person's property, modern usage includes anyone who receives property from the estate of a deceased person.

PATENT CLAIM

A statement included in a patent application that describes the structure of an invention in precise and exact terms, using a long established formal style and ... (more...)

A statement included in a patent application that describes the structure of an invention in precise and exact terms, using a long established formal style and precise terminology. Patent claims serve as a way for the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) to determine whether an invention is patentable, and as a way for a court to determine whether a patent has been infringed. In concept, a patent claim marks the boundaries of the patent in the same way as the legal description in a deed specifies the boundaries of the property.

ENCROACHMENT

The building of a structure entirely or partly on a neighbor's property. Encroachment may occur due to faulty surveying or sheer obstreperousness on the part of... (more...)

The building of a structure entirely or partly on a neighbor's property. Encroachment may occur due to faulty surveying or sheer obstreperousness on the part of the builder. Solutions range from paying the rightful property owner for the use of the property to the court-ordered removal of the structure.

OFFER

A proposal to enter into an agreement with another person. An offer must express the intent of the person making the offer to form a contract, must contain some... (more...)

A proposal to enter into an agreement with another person. An offer must express the intent of the person making the offer to form a contract, must contain some essential terms--including the price and subject matter of the contract--and must be communicated by the person making the offer. A legally valid acceptance of the offer will create a binding contract.

EMINENT DOMAIN

The power of the federal or state government to take private property for a public purpose, even if the property owner objects. The Fifth Amendment to the Unite... (more...)

The power of the federal or state government to take private property for a public purpose, even if the property owner objects. The Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution allows the government to take private property if the taking is for a public use and the owner is 'justly compensated' (usually, paid fair market value) for his or her loss. A public use is virtually anything that is sanctioned by a federal or state legislative body, but such uses may include roads, parks, reservoirs, schools, hospitals or other public buildings. Sometimes called condemnation, taking or expropriation.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

NORTHWESTERN OHIO BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. OTTAWA COUNTY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION

{Â¶ 1} We are asked to determine whether the mere expenditure of public funds by an institution, defined as a public authority in RC 4115.03(A), triggers the prevailing-wage requirement set forth in RC 4115.03 et seq. We hold that the wage requirement is triggered only when ...

STATE EX REL. COLUMBUS S. v. Fais

... {Â¶ 3} "The Company shall not be required to construct general distribution lines underground unless the cost of such special construction for general distribution lines and/or the cost of any change of existing overhead general distribution lines to underground which is required ...

Creech v. Brock & Assoc. Constr.

... CREECH et al., Appellants, v. BROCK & ASSOCIATES CONSTRUCTION, INC. et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. CA2008-12-024. ... Freund, Freeze & Arnold and Gordon D. Arnold, for appellee Brock & Associates Construction, Inc. Jonathan C. Turner, for appellee John R. Clark. ...

Mineral City Construction Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

R. Lasko Co. LPA, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

C. Jason Deeds

Charles Eugene Ringer

James Allen Desmith

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

UNCONSCIONABILITY

QUASI-COMMUNITY PROPERTY

YELLOW-DOG CONTRACT

MONTH-TO-MONTH TENANCY

HEIR

PATENT CLAIM

ENCROACHMENT

OFFER

EMINENT DOMAIN

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

NORTHWESTERN OHIO BUILDING & CONSTRUCTION TRADES COUNCIL v. OTTAWA COUNTY IMPROVEMENT CORPORATION

STATE EX REL. COLUMBUS S. v. Fais

Creech v. Brock & Assoc. Constr.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS