Monroe Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Karim A. Hamir
About | Practice Areas
The Cowlitz Law Group
111 W Columbia Way Suite 246 Vancouver, WA 98660» view map
Estate Law
Highly Trained & Engaged Professionals

The Cowlitz Law Group PLLC is a successful practice that is built upon providing its clients with personal service, measurable results that meet or exceed expectations.

800-957-9250
1. Karim A. Hamir Vancouver, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2003
  Western Michigan University J.D.
2. AboutThe Cowlitz Law Group
  We earn the right to be the client's first choice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Terry Hood Simon

Federal, Government, Estate, Criminal, Motor Vehicle

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

113 N Lewis St, Monroe, WA 98272

Jason T Schwisow

Federal, Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

115 3/4 W Main St, Monroe, WA 98272

Ronald William Doersch

State Government, Government, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

14751 N Kelsey St, Monroe, WA 98272

Jessica Connelly Ness

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, Criminal, Private Judging

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

806 W Main St, Monroe, WA 98272

Enrico Salvatore Leo

Private Judging, Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 27 Years

CONTACT

14414 179th Ave SE, Monroe, WA 98272

Mark Peyton Schnurle

Criminal, Employee Rights, Trusts, Entertainment, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

20901 60Th St Se, Snohomish, WA 98290

Karen Christina Skantze

Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Felony, Insurance

Status:

CONTACT

8422 113Th Ave Se, Snohomish, WA 98290

Kristin L. Jones

Commercial Bankruptcy, Commercial Real Estate, Juvenile Law, State Government

Status: Licensed: 46 Years

CONTACT

9530 150Th St Se, Snohomish, WA 98296

Paige Buurstra

Juvenile Law, Landlord-Tenant, Estate Planning, Guardianships & Conservatorships

Status: Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

116 Avenue, Snohomish, WA 98290

Walter Carl Wagner

Traffic, Motor Vehicle, Estate Planning, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 51 Years

CONTACT

8106 Riverview Rd, Snohomish, WA 98290

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

ACQUITTAL

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusio... (more...)

A decision by a judge or jury that a defendant in a criminal case is not guilty of a crime. An acquittal is not a finding of innocence; it is simply a conclusion that the prosecution has not proved its case beyond a reasonable doubt.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

... The Court of Appeals in each case held that the sentencing court improperly relied upon the State's assertion of the defendant's criminal history where the defendant did not stipulate to the criminal history and the State did not provide any evidence to establish the prior ...

State v. Momah

... 10 Article I, section 10 provides that "[j]ustice in all cases shall be administered openly." The Sixth Amendment to the United States Constitution and article I, section 22 of the Washington Constitution guarantee a criminal defendant the right to a "public trial by an impartial jury ...

State v. Codiga

... 2 Discovery of additional criminal history, rather than legal error, caused the increased offender score in this case. Codiga's ... form. Â¶ 5 The plea form also lists the prosecuting attorney's statement of Codiga's criminal history. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Monroe Criminal Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Cowlitz Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Terry Hood Simon

Jason T Schwisow

Ronald William Doersch

Jessica Connelly Ness

Enrico Salvatore Leo

Mark Peyton Schnurle

Karen Christina Skantze

Kristin L. Jones

Paige Buurstra

Walter Carl Wagner

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXPUNGE

LINEUP

PLEA

DIRECTED VERDICT

CRIMINAL INSANITY

SELF-DEFENSE

ACQUITTAL

IMPEACH

SEARCH WARRANT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Mendoza

State v. Momah

State v. Codiga

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS