Morristown Pharmaceutical Product Lawyer, New Jersey

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


John S. Hoyt

Class Action, Pharmaceutical Product, Household Mold, Products Liability
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

FREE CONSULTATION 

CONTACT

Julia Talarick

Litigation, Pharmaceutical Product, Reinsurance, Products Liability, Insurance
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Paul A Lisovicz

Litigation, Pharmaceutical Product, Reinsurance, Products Liability
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Morristown Pharmaceutical Product Lawyers and Morristown Pharmaceutical Product Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Health Care areas including Medical Products & Devices, Medicare & Medicaid and Other Health Care attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Sinclair v. Merck & Co., Inc.

... result when the claim is neither brought under traditional tort principles for exposure to an environmental contaminate, nor for personal injuries as the result of exposure to asbestos, but rather is brought specifically under the PLA for the ingestion of a pharmaceutical product. ...

McDarby v. Merck & Co., Inc.

... but we regard it as necessary to place in perspective the issues regarding the applicability of the New Jersey Product Liability Act ... profits arising from the sale of Vioxx — a drug envisioned as re-establishing Merck as preeminent in the field of pharmaceutical development and ...

Tartaglia v. UBS PaineWebber Inc.

... Even so, Pierce herself could not meet that test, because she had voiced a disagreement with her employer's medical research based on her belief that the formula for its pharmaceutical product contained an ingredient that was "controversial." In part, because human testing of ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.