New Point Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Seth Price
About | Practice Areas
Price Benowitz LLP
409 7Th St Nw Suite 200 Washington, DC 20004Â» view map
Criminal Law
Working Relentlessly For You

Our firm was built on the understanding that comprehensive representation does not begin and end in the courtroom.

202-600-9400
1. Seth Price Washington, DC
  Attorney at Law-DC,1996
  G. W. University Law School
2. AboutPrice Benowitz LLP
  Working Relentlessly for You
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael Carl Tillotson

✓

Criminal

Virginia’s Premier DWI/DUI Defense Firm

I strongly believe that if you are accused of a DUI/DWI, you deserve the best representation possible. This includes having an attorney who knows ever... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-878-1431

13195 Warwick Blvd, Newport News, VA 23602

Wayne Holcomb

✓

Divorce, Personal Injury, Traffic, Criminal, Mass Torts

Award-Winning Law Firm. Free information about your case.

Welcome to Holcomb Law. Right now, what you need is information, right? Even before you hire us, we are committed to getting you free information to h... (more)

CONTACT

800-978-5430

11815 Fountain Way, Newport News, VA 23606

Jeffrey Cantwell Martin

✓

Criminal, Education

Virginia’s Premier DWI/DUI Defense Firm

Mr. Martin received his undergraduate degree from Towson University, where he graduated summa cum laude with a host of scholarships and awards. While ... (more)

CONTACT

800-878-1431

13195 Warwick Blvd, Newport News, VA 23602

Terrence K. Martin

✓

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate

I am attorney Terrence K. martin of the Law Office of Terry Martin and Associates. I know that my clients come to me in times of real need, and I am c... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

757-599-9822

727 J. Clyde Morris Boulevard, Newport News, VA 23601

Polly Chong

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

732B Thimble Shoals Boulevard, Newport News, VA 23606

Paul H. Wilson

Criminal, Divorce, Personal Injury, Workers' Compensation

Status:

CONTACT

744A Thimble Shoals Boulevard, Newport News, VA 23606

Robert G. Saunders

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Civil Rights, Car Accident

Status:

CONTACT

6558 Main Street, Gloucester, VA 23061

Michael Thomas Soberick

Motor Vehicle, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

Gloucester Point, VA 23062

Rob Elliott

Traffic, Estate Planning, Criminal, Elder Law

Status:

CONTACT

7100 George Washington Memorial Highway, Yorktown, VA 23692

Roy H. Lasris

Divorce, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status:

CONTACT

914 Denbigh Blvd, Yorktown, VA 23692

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

NOLO CONTENDERE

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committ... (more...)

A plea entered by the defendant in response to being charged with a crime. If a defendant pleads nolo contendere, she neither admits nor denies that she committed the crime, but agrees to a punishment (usually a fine or jail time) as if guilty. Usually, this type of plea is entered because it can't be used as an admission of guilt if a civil case is held after the criminal trial.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

ASSAULT

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical co... (more...)

A crime that occurs when one person tries to physically harm another in a way that makes the person under attack feel immediately threatened. Actual physical contact is not necessary; threatening gestures that would alarm any reasonable person can constitute an assault. Compare battery.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

... Because the procedure provided in Code Â§ 19.2-187.1 adequately protects a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause and because the defendants in these appeals failed to utilize that procedure, we conclude that they waived the challenges under the ...

McCain v. Com.

... 335, 340, 288 SE2d 475, 478 (1982). Under well-settled principles of law, police officers may stop a person for the purpose of investigating possible criminal behavior even though no probable cause exists for an arrest. Terry, 392 US at 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868. ...

McMorris v. Com.

... This was all contemporaneous. Therefore[,] the robbery statute applies." In refusing McMorris' petition for appeal, the Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence established that McMorris shared the criminal intent of those who did steal Ottey's telephone and other items. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

New Point Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

Price Benowitz LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael Carl Tillotson

Wayne Holcomb

Jeffrey Cantwell Martin

Terrence K. Martin

Polly Chong

Paul H. Wilson

Robert G. Saunders

Michael Thomas Soberick

Rob Elliott

Roy H. Lasris

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

ACTUS REUS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

NOLO CONTENDERE

SEARCH WARRANT

ASSAULT

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

McCain v. Com.

McMorris v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS