New Providence Estate Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Brian Levine
About | Practice Areas
Levine Law, LLC
22 E Grant St New Castle, PA 16101» view map
Estate and Real Estate Law
3rd Generation Law Firm

Levine Law aims to create the most direct, simple, and common sense approach to achieve the client's desired end result.

800-711-7881
1. Brian Levine New Castle, PA
  Attorney at Law- PA
  West Virginia University College of Law, J.D. 2005
2. AboutLevine Law, LLC
  3rd Generation Law Firm
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

John W. Metzger

Estate Administration, Estate Planning, Adoption, Business Organization, Environmental Law Other

Status:

CONTACT

49 North Duke Street, Lancaster, PA 17602

Paul S. Zimmerman

Wills & Probate, Estate Planning, Family Law, Child Support, Estate

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

197 Lakewood Drive, Pequea, PA 17565

James N. Clymer

Litigation, Estate Planning, Family Law, Business Organization, Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

408 W Chestnut St, Lancaster, PA 17608

Elizabeth A. Bartlow

Wills & Probate, Estate, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

53 N Duke Street, Lancaster, PA 17602

Erik Drakin Spurlin

Tax, Estate Planning, Business & Trade

Status: Licensed: 15 Years

CONTACT

33 N Duke St, Lancaster, PA 17602

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

AUGMENTED ESTATE

In general terms, an augmented estate consists of property owned by both a deceased person and his or her spouse. The concept of the augmented estate is used on... (more...)

In general terms, an augmented estate consists of property owned by both a deceased person and his or her spouse. The concept of the augmented estate is used only in some states. Its value is calculated only if a surviving spouse declines whatever he or she was left by will and instead claims a share of the deceased spouse's estate. (This is called taking against the will.) The amount of this 'statutory share' or 'elective share' depends on state law.

TAKING AGAINST THE WILL

A procedure under state law that gives a surviving spouse the right to demand a certain share (usually one-third to one-half) of the deceased spouse's property.... (more...)

A procedure under state law that gives a surviving spouse the right to demand a certain share (usually one-third to one-half) of the deceased spouse's property. The surviving spouse can take that share instead of accepting whatever he or she inherited through the deceased spouse's will. If the surviving spouse decides to take the statutory share, it's called 'taking against the will.' Dower and curtesy is another name for the same legal process.

PROBATE

The court process following a person's death that includes proving the authenticity of the deceased person's will appointing someone to handle the deceased pers... (more...)

The court process following a person's death that includes proving the authenticity of the deceased person's will appointing someone to handle the deceased person's affairs identifying and inventorying the deceased person's property paying debts and taxes identifying heirs, and distributing the deceased person's property according to the will or, if there is no will, according to state law. Formal court-supervised probate is a costly, time-consuming process -- a windfall for lawyers -- which is best avoided if possible.

PROVING A WILL

Convincing a probate court that a document is truly the deceased person's will. Usually this is a simple formality that the executor or administrator easily sat... (more...)

Convincing a probate court that a document is truly the deceased person's will. Usually this is a simple formality that the executor or administrator easily satisfies by showing that the will was signed and dated by the deceased person in front of two or more witnesses. When the will is holographic -- that is, completely handwritten by the deceased and not witnessed, it is still valid in many states if the executor can produce relatives and friends to testify that the handwriting is that of the deceased.

PERSONAL PROPERTY

All property other than land and buildings attached to land. Cars, bank accounts, wages, securities, a small business, furniture, insurance policies, jewelry, p... (more...)

All property other than land and buildings attached to land. Cars, bank accounts, wages, securities, a small business, furniture, insurance policies, jewelry, patents, pets and season baseball tickets are all examples of personal property. Personal property may also be called personal effects, movable property, goods and chattel, and personalty. Compare real estate.

STATUTORY SHARE

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceas... (more...)

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceased spouse's property, but in some states the exact amount of the spouse's share depends on whether or not the couple has young children and, in a few states, on how long the couple was married. In most states, if the deceased spouse left a will, the surviving spouse must choose either what the will provides or the statutory share. Sometimes the statutory share is known by its more arcane legal name, dower and curtesy, or as a forced or elective share.

FAMILY POT TRUST

See pot trust.

CREDIT SHELTER TRUST

See AB trust.

TESTAMENTARY TRUST

A trust created by a will, effective only upon the death of the willmaker.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estate of Considine v. Wachovia Bank

Â¶ 2 Matthew Considine died on May 23, 2000. On June 2, 2005, the administrator of his estate [1] filed a civil action in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas naming Wachovia Bank [2] and Appellee Robert E. Rozinski defendants. The complaint alleged that Appellee was ...

In re Estate of Sauers

Â¶ 2 Pursuant to an employee group benefit plan, effective June 1, 1997, Paul J. Sauers, III, ("Decedent") obtained a $40,000.00 life insurance policy issued by the Hartford Life Insurance Company ("Insurer"). There is no dispute that the insurance policy is part of an employee ...

Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC

Â¶ 1 This is a consolidated appeal from the judgment entered against Appellants, Dana Companies, LLC f/k/a Dana Corporation (Dana) and John Crane, Inc., f/k/a Crane Packing (Crane), in this products liability action initiated by Appellee, the Estate of Louis A. Hicks, ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

New Providence Estate Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Levine Law, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John W. Metzger

Paul S. Zimmerman

James N. Clymer

Elizabeth A. Bartlow

Erik Drakin Spurlin

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

AUGMENTED ESTATE

TAKING AGAINST THE WILL

PROBATE

PROVING A WILL

PERSONAL PROPERTY

STATUTORY SHARE

FAMILY POT TRUST

CREDIT SHELTER TRUST

TESTAMENTARY TRUST

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estate of Considine v. Wachovia Bank

In re Estate of Sauers

Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS