Oakford Antitrust Lawyer, Indiana

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition

Warning! No lawyers found in this specified area.

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.

... 1. Whether Berghausen, as an indirect purchaser, had standing to bring his antitrust claim against Microsoft; 2. Whether Berghausen's allegation of degradation of his computer's performance states a claim of an "antitrust injury"; and. ...

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

... II. Indiana Antitrust Act. ... D. Specific Provisions of the Indiana Antitrust Act. Natare claims a violation of Section 3, and seeks treble damages for its lost time in preparing a useless bid and attorney fees, under Section 7 of the Indiana Antitrust Act. ...

City of Auburn v. Mavis

... (D & L). Mavis alleged that prior to open and competitive bidding the city and D & L contrived to develop specifications favoring equipment sold by D & L such that they violated the antitrust statute. Mavis claimed as damages the time spent in preparing his bid. ...

Oakford Antitrust Lawyer, Indiana

TIPS

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Berghausen v. Microsoft Corp.

Brownsburg Community School Corp. v. Natare Corp.

City of Auburn v. Mavis

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS