Otis Criminal Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Stephen Babcock
About | Practice Areas
Babcock Trial Lawyers
10101 Siegen Ln #3-C Baton Rouge, LA 70810» view map
Criminal Defense
We Want Your Injury Claim PAID NOW!

At Babcock Trial Lawyers, we work for our clients, maintaining our reputation of excellence as criminal defense & personal injury lawyers in Baton Rouge.

225-500-5000
1. Stephen Babcock Baton Rouge, LA
  Attorney at Law- LA, 2000
  Paul M. Hebert Law Center, J.D.
2. AboutBabcock Trial Lawyers
  100% Client satisfaction guarantee
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Leo Joseph Flynn

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment, Estate

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

2820 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

J. Marc Lampert

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Divorce, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 51 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

608 Murray Street, Alexandria, LA 71301

Katharine Geary

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 41 Years

CONTACT

3327 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Harold A Murry

Family Law, Divorce, Adoption, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

610 Murray St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Thomas Rockwell Willson

Criminal, Elder Law, Credit & Debt, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 47 Years

CONTACT

1330 Jackson St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Richard V Burnes

Federal Trial Practice, Criminal, Civil & Human Rights, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 63 Years

CONTACT

711 Washington St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Ernie L Vallery

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Employment

Status: Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

526 Murray St, Alexandria, LA 71301

Ronald P Collins

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

3150 Rigolette Road, Pineville, LA 71360

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

MOTION IN LIMINE

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply ... (more...)

A request submitted to the court before trial in an attempt to exclude evidence from the proceedings. A motion in limine is usually made by a party when simply the mention of the evidence would prejudice the jury against that party, even if the judge later instructed the jury to disregard the evidence. For example, if a defendant in a criminal trial were questioned and confessed to the crime without having been read his Miranda rights, his lawyer would file a motion in limine to keep evidence of the confession out of the trial.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

CRIMINAL LAW

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not p... (more...)

Laws written by Congress and state legislators that make certain behavior illegal and punishable by fines and/or imprisonment. By contrast, civil laws are not punishable by imprisonment. In order to be found guilty of a criminal law, the prosecution must show that the defendant intended to act as he did; in civil law, you may sometimes be responsible for your actions even though you did not intend the consequences. For example, civil law makes you financially responsible for a car accident you caused but didn't intend.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

CONTINGENCY FEE

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obt... (more...)

A method of paying a lawyer for legal representation by which, instead of an hourly or per job fee, the lawyer receives a percentage of the money her client obtains after settling or winning the case. Often contingency fee agreements -- which are most commonly used in personal injury cases -- award the successful lawyer between 20% and 50% of the amount recovered. Lawyers representing defendants charged with crimes may not charge contingency fees. In most states, contingency fee agreements must be in writing.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ates

... LOLLEY, J. This criminal appeal arises from the Third Judicial District Court, Parish of Union, State of Louisiana. Edward Eugene Ates, Jr. ... The offense of illegal use of a weapon requires proof of either general intent or criminal negligence. State v. Walker, 26,026 (La.App. ...

State v. Ates

8 So.3d 581 (2009). STATE of Louisiana v. Edward Eugene ATES, Jr. No. 2008-KO-2341. Supreme Court of Louisiana. May 15, 2009. Denied.

State v. Jones

... 2781, 61 L.Ed.2d 560 (1979). Under the Jackson standard, a review of a criminal conviction record for sufficiency of evidence does not require the court to ask whether it believes that the evidence at the trial established guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Otis Criminal Lawyer, Louisiana

Sponsored Law Firm

Babcock Trial Lawyers

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Leo Joseph Flynn

J. Marc Lampert

Katharine Geary

Harold A Murry

Thomas Rockwell Willson

Richard V Burnes

Ernie L Vallery

Ronald P Collins

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

INFORMED CONSENT

MCNAGHTEN RULE

MOTION IN LIMINE

ACCESSORY

CRIMINAL LAW

IMPEACH

MENS REA

CONTINGENCY FEE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Ates

State v. Ates

State v. Jones

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS