Peach Springs Felony Lawyer, Arizona, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Peach Springs Felony lawyer.
Below are all Peach Springs lawyers.

Leroy Rodney Albright

State Government, Government, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Gerald T Gavin

Defense Contracts, Criminal, Education, Education

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Affordable Aggressive Representation

Personal Injury, Health Care, Insurance, Traffic

Status:

CONTACT

1921 Motor Ave Ste B, Kingman, AZ 86401

Lee Frank Jantzen

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Blaze Van Dine

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86409

Anna Amelia Bennett

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Ros Saciuk

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Marian Carol

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

Kristen Elizabeth Hoffmeyer

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 30 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86402

LynnAnn Wilson

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

Kingman, AZ 86401

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecu... (more...)

One of the most sacred principles in the American criminal justice system, holding that a defendant is innocent until proven guilty. In other words, the prosecution must prove, beyond a reasonable doubt, each element of the crime charged.

SELF-DEFENSE

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal... (more...)

An affirmative defense to a crime. Self-defense is the use of reasonable force to protect oneself from an aggressor. Self-defense shields a person from criminal liability for the harm inflicted on the aggressor. For example, a robbery victim who takes the robber's weapon and uses it against the robber during a struggle won't be liable for assault and battery since he can show that his action was reasonably necessary to protect himself from imminent harm.

EXPUNGE

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the crimi... (more...)

To intentionally destroy, obliterate or strike out records or information in files, computers and other depositories. For example, state law may allow the criminal records of a juvenile offender to be expunged when he reaches the age of majority, to allow him to begin his adult life with a clean record. Or, a company or government agency may routinely expunge out-of-date records to save storage space.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Smith

... RYAN, Justice. Â¶ 1 This case requires us to decide if a defendant's claim that prior felony convictions from other jurisdictions are legally insufficient for sentence enhancement purposes can be reviewed on appeal when he did not preserve the claim in the trial court. ...

State v. Peek

... as follows: After conviction of a felony offense that is included in chapter 14 of this title, if probation is available, probation may continue for a term . . . up ... B. Construing "a felony offense that is included in chapter 14". Â¶ 11 When Peek ...

State v. Martinez

... B. Â¶ 13 In the fall of 2005, a jury found Martinez guilty of premeditated first degree murder, felony murder, and kidnapping. ... B. Â¶ 21 The jury returned separate verdicts finding that Martinez committed felony murder and premeditated murder. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Peach Springs Felony Lawyer, Arizona, page 2

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Leroy Rodney Albright

Gerald T Gavin

Affordable Aggressive Representation

Lee Frank Jantzen

Blaze Van Dine

Anna Amelia Bennett

Ros Saciuk

Marian Carol

Kristen Elizabeth Hoffmeyer

LynnAnn Wilson

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

CRIMINAL INSANITY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

PRESUMPTION OF INNOCENCE

SELF-DEFENSE

EXPUNGE

GRAND JURY

HOMICIDE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Smith

State v. Peek

State v. Martinez

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS