2. / /

Penland Antitrust Lawyer, North Carolina

Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: International Antitrust, Unfair Competition


Member Representative

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Penland Antitrust Lawyers and Penland Antitrust Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Business areas including Administrative Law, Banking & Finance, Business Organization, Contract, Corporate, Insurance, Merger & Acquisition and Securities attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Hyde v. Abbott Laboratories, Inc.

... In November of 1994, plaintiffs Suzanne Hyde and Lynn Meeks filed a class action lawsuit on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated (hereinafter plaintiffs), seeking damages from defendants for alleged violations of North Carolina's antitrust laws—NC Gen.Stat. ...

Rose v. Vulcan Materials Company

... prices and would "not sell any stone to anyone other than the State Highway Commission for 528 prices less than [certain specified higher prices] from the Cycle quarry" was in violation of both the Robinson-Patman Act, 15 USC § 13(a) (1971) and State antitrust law and so was ...

Madison Cablevision, Inc. v. City of Morganton

... The sixth and seventh claims for relief allege, respectively, attempted monopolization in violation of section 2 of the Sherman Act, 15 USCA § 2 (West 1974), and violation of article I, sections 32 and 34 of the North Carolina Constitution and the monopoly and antitrust laws of ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

  • Free Consultation
  • Male
  • Female
  • Suspended

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.