Princeton Employment Discrimination Lawyer, Minnesota

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination

Betsey Lynne Lund

Real Estate, Employment Discrimination, Family Law, Business & Trade
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  17 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Princeton Employment Discrimination Lawyers and Princeton Employment Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Employment areas including Employee Rights, Employment Contracts, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Labor Law, Occupational Safety & Health, Pension & Benefits, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Workers' Compensation and Wrongful Termination attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bahr v. Capella University

... slowly" in the review process to "minimize the performance issues raised" in the review and to allow the legal department to review LA's performance review before showing it to LA All of these actions benefited LA Generally, to prevail on an employment discrimination claim, the ...

Monson v. Rochester Athletic Club

... When appellants clarified that their claims were also asserted under a disparate-impact theory, respondents argued that the disparate-impact theory is not available under the MHRA for claims arising outside the context of employment discrimination. ...

Frieler v. Carlson Marketing Group, Inc.

... First, we agree with the Supreme Court's reasoning and conclude that a strict liability standard in all cases of supervisor harassment would be contrary to the MHRA's express policy of "secur[ing] for persons in this state, freedom from discrimination: (1) in employment because of ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.