Richardsville DUI-DWI Lawyer, Virginia

JS Bin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Tillotson
About | Practice Areas
Tillotson & Martin, LLP
DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Virginiaâ€™s Premier DWI/DUI Defense Firm

Michael C. Tillotson is the one to choose when it comes to DWI/DUI defense in Virginia.

800-878-1431
1. Michael Tillotson Newport News, VA
  Attorney at Law - VA, 1992
  William & Mary Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutTillotson & Martin, LLP
  DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

George Ernest Marzloff

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

385 Garrisonville Road, Stafford, VA 22554

Andrew Joseph Cornick

Traffic, DUI-DWI, Domestic Violence & Neglect, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

1671 Jefferson Davis Highway, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

Garrett Michael Swain

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 44 Years

CONTACT

118 Madison Cir, Locust Grove, VA 22508

Mark Andrew Murphy

Traffic, Internet, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

411 Elm St, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

John David Mayoras

Domestic Violence & Neglect, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Merger & Acquisition, Child Custody

Status:

CONTACT

614 Princess Anne St, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

Susan Frances Fremit

DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

9130 Courthouse Road, Spotsylvania, VA 22553

Beverly Jo Haney

Car Accident, Identity Theft, Civil Rights, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

9108 Courthouse Road, Spotsylvania, VA 22553

B. H. Woodbridge

Criminal, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, Trucking

Status:

CONTACT

710 Princess Anne Street, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

Robert G. Hyman

Traffic, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2102 Jefferson Davis Hwy, Stafford, VA 22554

Adam C Calinger

State Appellate Practice, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Civil Rights

Status:

CONTACT

412 Morningside Dr, Fredericksburg, VA 22401

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

BURGLARY

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need no... (more...)

The crime of breaking into and entering a building with the intention to commit a felony. The breaking and entering need not be by force, and the felony need not be theft. For instance, someone would be guilty of burglary if he entered a house through an unlocked door in order to commit a murder.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

... The court found him guilty of driving under the influence (DUI), in violation of Code Â§ 18.2-266. ... Another of those exhibits, Exhibit 3, is a summons that purports to show that Mwangi had been convicted of DUI in the Alexandria General District Court. ...

Woody v. Com.

... County as a party. However, this case involved two simultaneous prosecutions â€” one on behalf of the Commonwealth (the refusal charge) and one on behalf of the County (the DUI charge). While the Commonwealth's Attorney ...

Grant v. Com.

682 SE2d 84 (2009). 54 Va. App. 714. Phillip Lawton GRANT v. COMMONWEALTH of Virginia. Record No. 0877-08-4. Court of Appeals of Virginia, Richmond. September 1, 2009. 85 Patrick M. Blanch, Assistant Public Defender ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Richardsville DUI-DWI Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

Tillotson & Martin, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

George Ernest Marzloff

Andrew Joseph Cornick

Garrett Michael Swain

Mark Andrew Murphy

John David Mayoras

Susan Frances Fremit

Beverly Jo Haney

B. H. Woodbridge

Robert G. Hyman

Adam C Calinger

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

INFORMED CONSENT

DIRECTED VERDICT

FEDERAL COURT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

BURGLARY

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

HOMICIDE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

IMPEACH

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Mwangi v. Com.

Woody v. Com.

Grant v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS