Rockland Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226» view map
Probate
Over 30 Years Experience

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Probate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Not enough matches for Rockland Misdemeanor lawyer.
Below are all Rockland lawyers.

Teddy J. Baird

Real Estate, Government, Elder Law, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

300 Poplar St, Ontonagon, MI 49953

James R. Jessup

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

37454 Strang Rd, Ontonagon, MI 49953

Lois S. Kallunki

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 40 Years

CONTACT

34374 State Highway M64, Ontonagon, MI 49953

John S. Robinson

General Practice

Status:

CONTACT

509 Epidote St, Ontonagon, MI 49953

Jesse J. Monville

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

33 Hemlock St, White Pine, MI 49971

Andrew Charles Seid

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 12 Years

CONTACT

30482 Dutch Rd, Ontonagon, MI 49953

Paul H. Hurst

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

30417 Tapiola Rd, Pelkie, MI 49958

Jerry D. Taylor

Real Estate, Dispute Resolution, Lawsuit & Dispute, Agriculture

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

25021 Saarinen Rd, Watton, MI 49970

Mark A. Esqueda

Criminal, Native People, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

N5384 US Hwy 45, Watersmeet, MI 49969

Daniel J. Wisti

Landlord-Tenant, Government, Employment, Divorce

Status: Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

41801 Half Moon Beach Rd, Chassell, MI 49916

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to perm... (more...)

The component parts of crimes. For example, 'Robbery' is defined as the taking and carrying away of property of another by force or fear with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the property. Each of those four parts is an element that the prosecution must prove beyond a reasonable doubt.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

FEDERAL COURT

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, fe... (more...)

A branch of the United States government with power derived directly from the U.S. Constitution. Federal courts decide cases involving the U.S. Constitution, federal law--for example, patents, federal taxes, labor law and federal crimes, such as robbing a federally chartered bank--and cases where the parties are from different states and are involved in a dispute for $75,000 or more.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

... And that was that. So, the People have to show that the defendant entered without permission, for the purpose of committing a misdemeanor, taking property, or committing a felony. That his body did go in, so he entered without the owner's permission. ...

People v. Sadows

... and remand for further proceedings. 96 I. In Docket No. 286689, defendant, Colleen Sadows, was charged with operating a vehicle while intoxicated (OWI), MCL 257.625(1), a misdemeanor. Because Sadows was previously ...

People v. Reid

... SAWYER, J. This case presents the question whether the circuit court possesses the jurisdiction 160 to try a defendant on a misdemeanor charge when the accompanying felony charge was dismissed before the beginning of trial. ... Thus, only the misdemeanor charge remained. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Rockland Misdemeanor Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Teddy J. Baird

James R. Jessup

Lois S. Kallunki

John S. Robinson

Jesse J. Monville

Andrew Charles Seid

Paul H. Hurst

Jerry D. Taylor

Mark A. Esqueda

Daniel J. Wisti

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

ELEMENTS (OF A CRIME)

IMPRISON

INFRACTION

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

FEDERAL COURT

ACTUS REUS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Wilder

People v. Sadows

People v. Reid

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS