Roscommon Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Jacob Cristoforo
About | Practice Areas
Jacob A. Cristoforo PLLC
P.O. Box 146 Kawkawlin, MI 48631» view map
Criminal Defense
Fighting For Your Rights

If you are looking to hire a lawyer in Michigan, Jacob Cristoforo will be happy to help you. Attorney Cristoforo specializes in Criminal Defense.

800-892-7670
1. Jacob Cristoforo Kawkawlin, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 2011
  Thomas M. Cooley Law School J.D.
2. AboutJacob A. Cristoforo PLLC
  Legal Expertise You Can Rely On
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
7. Profile

John P. S. Miller

Real Estate, Misdemeanor, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

Roscommon, MI 48653

John E. Rosczyk

Real Estate, Estate, Misdemeanor, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 52 Years

CONTACT

203 Springside Ct, Roscommon, MI 48653

Robert W. Bennett

Divorce, Criminal, Contract, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

500 Lake St, Roscommon, MI 48653

Mary A. Beebe

Government, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

500 Lake St, Roscommon, MI 48653

Mark D. Jernigan

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Family Law

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

500 Lake St, Roscommon, MI 48653

Aaron S. Coltrane

Criminal, Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3975 W Federal Hwy., Roscommon, MI 48653

Peter Joseph Tomasek

Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

4190 W Pinewood Dr, Roscommon, MI 48653

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental s... (more...)

The mental component of criminal liability. To be guilty of most crimes, a defendant must have committed the criminal act (the actus reus) in a certain mental state (the mens rea). The mens rea of robbery, for example, is the intent to permanently deprive the owner of his property.

INFRACTION

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, ho... (more...)

A minor violation of the law that is punishable only by a fine--for example, a traffic or parking ticket. Not all vehicle-related violations are infractions, however--refusing to identify oneself when involved in an accident is a misdemeanor in some states.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

CIVIL

Noncriminal. See civil case.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

INFORMED CONSENT

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available al... (more...)

An agreement to do something or to allow something to happen, made with complete knowledge of all relevant facts, such as the risks involved or any available alternatives. For example, a patient may give informed consent to medical treatment only after the healthcare professional has disclosed all possible risks involved in accepting or rejecting the treatment. A healthcare provider or facility may be held responsible for an injury caused by an undisclosed risk. In another context, a person accused of committing a crime cannot give up his constitutional rights--for example, to remain silent or to talk with an attorney--unless and until he has been informed of those rights, usually via the well-known Miranda warnings.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Roscommon Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Jacob A. Cristoforo PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

John P. S. Miller

John E. Rosczyk

Robert W. Bennett

Mary A. Beebe

Mark D. Jernigan

Aaron S. Coltrane

Peter Joseph Tomasek

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MENS REA

INFRACTION

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

INDECENT EXPOSURE

DIRECTED VERDICT

CIVIL

PROSECUTE

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

INFORMED CONSENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details