Russell Estate Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Brian Levine
About | Practice Areas
Levine Law, LLC
22 E Grant St New Castle, PA 16101» view map
Estate and Real Estate Law
3rd Generation Law Firm

Levine Law aims to create the most direct, simple, and common sense approach to achieve the client's desired end result.

800-711-7881
1. Brian Levine New Castle, PA
  Attorney at Law- PA
  West Virginia University College of Law, J.D. 2005
2. AboutLevine Law, LLC
  3rd Generation Law Firm
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Estate Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Elizabeth Kathryn Feronti

International, Estate, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

416 East Street, Warren, PA 16365

Rene Heilman Johnson

Estate

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

311 Liberty St, Warren, PA 16365

David Allan Bauer

Divorce & Family Law, Real Estate, Estate, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

x, Sugar Grove, PA 16350

Daniel C. Lang

Real Estate, Lawsuit & Dispute, Estate, Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 14 Years

CONTACT

Bradford, PA 16701

Matthew Scott Bleacher

Land Use & Zoning, Real Estate, Workers' Compensation, Personal Injury, Wills

Status: Licensed: 10 Years

CONTACT

33 Barbour Street, Bradford, PA 16701

Jay Paul Kahle

Lawsuit & Dispute, Industry Specialties, Estate, Civil & Human Rights

Status: Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

71 Main St, Bradford, PA 16701

Erik A. Ross

Estate, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Bankruptcy

Status:

CONTACT

63 N Fraley St, Kane, PA 16735

Thomas John Ruth

Real Estate, Traffic, Lawsuit, Criminal, Estate

Status: Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

224 Maple Ave, Corry, PA 16407

Jennifer L. Jones

Litigation, Estate Planning, Bankruptcy, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

Titusville, PA 16354

Richard W. Roeder

International, Government, Estate, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: Licensed: 56 Years

CONTACT

115 S Franklin St, Titusville, PA 16354

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

SURROGATE COURT

See probate court.

INTER VIVOS TRUST

The Latin name, favored by some lawyers, for a living trust. 'Inter vivos' is Latin for 'between the living.'

SELF-PROVING WILL

A will that is created in a way that allows a probate court to easily accept it as the true will of the person who has died. In most states, a will is self-prov... (more...)

A will that is created in a way that allows a probate court to easily accept it as the true will of the person who has died. In most states, a will is self-proving when two witnesses sign under penalty of perjury that they observed the willmaker sign it and that he told them it was his will. If no one contests the validity of the will, the probate court will accept the will without hearing the testimony of the witnesses or other evidence. To make a self-proving will in other states, the willmaker and one or more witnesses must sign an affidavit (sworn statement) before a notary public certifying that the will is genuine and that all willmaking formalities have been observed.

ANCILLARY PROBATE

A probate proceeding conducted in a different state from the one the deceased person resided in at the time of death. Usually, ancillary probate proceedings are... (more...)

A probate proceeding conducted in a different state from the one the deceased person resided in at the time of death. Usually, ancillary probate proceedings are necessary if the deceased person owned real estate in another state.

DOWER AND CURTESY

A surviving spouse's right to receive a set portion of the deceased spouse's estate -- usually one-third to one-half. Dower (not to be confused with a 'dowry') ... (more...)

A surviving spouse's right to receive a set portion of the deceased spouse's estate -- usually one-third to one-half. Dower (not to be confused with a 'dowry') refers to the portion to which a surviving wife is entitled, while curtesy refers to what a man may claim. Until recently, these amounts differed in a number of states. However, because discrimination on the basis of sex is now illegal in most cases, most states have abolished dower and curtesy and generally provide the same benefits regardless of sex -- and this amount is often known simply as the statutory share. Under certain circumstances, a living spouse may not be able to sell or convey property that is subject to the other spouse's dower and curtesy or statutory share rights.

STATUTORY SHARE

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceas... (more...)

The portion of a deceased person's estate that a spouse is entitled to claim under state law. The statutory share is usually one-third or one-half of the deceased spouse's property, but in some states the exact amount of the spouse's share depends on whether or not the couple has young children and, in a few states, on how long the couple was married. In most states, if the deceased spouse left a will, the surviving spouse must choose either what the will provides or the statutory share. Sometimes the statutory share is known by its more arcane legal name, dower and curtesy, or as a forced or elective share.

PER CAPITA

Under a will, the most common method of determining what share of property each beneficiary gets when one of the beneficiaries dies before the willmaker, leavin... (more...)

Under a will, the most common method of determining what share of property each beneficiary gets when one of the beneficiaries dies before the willmaker, leaving children of his or her own. For example, Fred leaves his house jointly to his son Alan and his daughter Julie. But Alan dies before Fred, leaving two young children. If Fred's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per capita, Julie and the two grandchildren will each take a third. If, on the other hand, Fred's will states that heirs of a deceased beneficiary are to receive the property per stirpes, Julie will receive one-half of the property, and Alan's two children will share his half in equal shares (through Alan by right of representation).

TRUST MERGER

Under a trust, the situation that occurs when the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary are the same person or institution. Then, there's no longer the separati... (more...)

Under a trust, the situation that occurs when the sole trustee and the sole beneficiary are the same person or institution. Then, there's no longer the separation between the trustee's legal ownership of trust property from the beneficiary's interest. The trust 'merges' and ceases to exist.

SECONDARY MEANING

In trademark law, a mark that is not inherently distinctive becomes protected after developing a 'secondary meaning': great public recognition through long use ... (more...)

In trademark law, a mark that is not inherently distinctive becomes protected after developing a 'secondary meaning': great public recognition through long use and exposure in the marketplace. For example, though first names are not generally considered inherently distinctive, Ben & Jerry's Ice Cream has become so well known that it is now entitled to maximum trademark protection.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estate of Considine v. Wachovia Bank

Â¶ 2 Matthew Considine died on May 23, 2000. On June 2, 2005, the administrator of his estate [1] filed a civil action in the Montgomery County Court of Common Pleas naming Wachovia Bank [2] and Appellee Robert E. Rozinski defendants. The complaint alleged that Appellee was ...

In re Estate of Sauers

Â¶ 2 Pursuant to an employee group benefit plan, effective June 1, 1997, Paul J. Sauers, III, ("Decedent") obtained a $40,000.00 life insurance policy issued by the Hartford Life Insurance Company ("Insurer"). There is no dispute that the insurance policy is part of an employee ...

Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC

Â¶ 1 This is a consolidated appeal from the judgment entered against Appellants, Dana Companies, LLC f/k/a Dana Corporation (Dana) and John Crane, Inc., f/k/a Crane Packing (Crane), in this products liability action initiated by Appellee, the Estate of Louis A. Hicks, ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Russell Estate Lawyer, Pennsylvania

Sponsored Law Firm

Levine Law, LLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Elizabeth Kathryn Feronti

Rene Heilman Johnson

David Allan Bauer

Daniel C. Lang

Matthew Scott Bleacher

Jay Paul Kahle

Erik A. Ross

Thomas John Ruth

Jennifer L. Jones

Richard W. Roeder

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

SURROGATE COURT

INTER VIVOS TRUST

SELF-PROVING WILL

ANCILLARY PROBATE

DOWER AND CURTESY

STATUTORY SHARE

PER CAPITA

TRUST MERGER

SECONDARY MEANING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Estate of Considine v. Wachovia Bank

In re Estate of Sauers

Estate of Hicks v. Dana Companies, LLC

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS