Saint Clairsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:
Sean Logue
Google+ | Contact Us
Sean Logue & Associates
200 First Avenue 3rd Floor #301A Pittsburgh, PA 15222 » view map
DUI, Sex Crimes, Drug Crimes, Expungements
Phones Answered 24 Hours A Day

Our lawyers bring a thorough understanding of criminal issues to help minimize the damage that a DUI charge can bring to our clients.

412-389-0805
1. Sean Logue Pittsburgh, PA
  Attorney At Law - Pennsylvania, 2008
  West Virginia, J.D. - 2007
2. Google+
  Visit us and follow on Google+ to interact on social media.
3. Contact UsEmail or Call 24/7
  Free initial consultation. Contact us today.
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
4. Blog
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Michael Justin Shaheen

Real Estate, Estate, Criminal, Corporate

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 36 Years

CONTACT

128 S Marietta St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Eric Nelson Costine

Family Law, Criminal, Bankruptcy, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 39 Years

CONTACT

136 W Main St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Nicole Renee White

Social Security, Workers' Compensation, Criminal, Medical Malpractice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 17 Years

CONTACT

126 E Main St, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

Christopher Michael Berhalter

Real Estate, Family Law, Criminal, Insurance

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

52160 National Rd, Saint Clairsville, OH 43950

James Lee Nichelson

Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 50 Years

CONTACT

Martins Ferry, OH 43935

Thomas Matthew Ryncarz

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Estate, Real Estate, Landlord-Tenant

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

3713 Central Avenue, Shadyside, OH 43947

Rupert Nelms Beetham

Real Estate, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Estate

Status: Inactive Licensed: 53 Years

CONTACT

Cadiz, OH 43907

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Juvenile Law, Real Estate, Estate, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 54 Years

CONTACT

232 S Main St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Government, Environmental Law Other, Criminal, Religious Discrimination

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 33 Years

CONTACT

100 W Market St, Cadiz, OH 43907

Audrey Jenna Hokes

Juvenile Law, Federal Appellate Practice, Family Law, Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

105 Jamison Ave, Cadiz, OH 43907

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

PROBABLE CAUSE

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a searc... (more...)

The amount and quality of information police must have before they can arrest or search without a warrant or that a judge must have before she will sign a search warrant allowing the police to conduct a search or arrest a suspect. Reliable information must show that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and the suspect is involved.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

GRAND JURY

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the f... (more...)

In criminal cases, a group that decides whether there is enough evidence to justify an indictment (formal charges) and a trial. A grand jury indictment is the first step, after arrest, in any formal prosecution of a felony.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

INTENTIONAL TORT

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, ar... (more...)

A deliberate act that causes harm to another, for which the victim may sue the wrongdoer for damages. Acts of domestic violence, such as assault and battery, are intentional torts (as well as crimes).

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

... Court of Ohio. However, for criminal sentences imposed on and after July 11, 2006, in which a trial court failed to properly impose postrelease control, trial courts shall apply the procedures set forth in RC 2929.191. {Â¶ 2} In this ...

State v. Colon

... Robert L. Tobik, Cuyahoga County Public Defender, and Cullen Sweeney, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. Jason A. Macke, urging reversal for amicus curiae Ohio Association of Criminal Defense Lawyers. MOYER, CJ. ...

State v. Baker

... We have previously determined that "in order to decide whether an order issued by a trial court in a criminal proceeding is a reviewable final order, appellate courts should apply the definitions of `final order' contained in RC 2505.02." State v. Muncie (2001), 91 Ohio St.3d 440 ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Saint Clairsville Criminal Lawyer, Ohio

Sponsored Law Firm

Sean Logue & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Michael Justin Shaheen

Eric Nelson Costine

Nicole Renee White

Christopher Michael Berhalter

James Lee Nichelson

Thomas Matthew Ryncarz

Rupert Nelms Beetham

Geoffrey Bird Mosser

Matthew Paul Puskarich

Audrey Jenna Hokes

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

PROBABLE CAUSE

SEARCH WARRANT

GRAND JURY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

INTENTIONAL TORT

SPECIFIC INTENT

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Singleton

State v. Colon

State v. Baker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details