Sauk Rapids Tax Lawyer, Minnesota

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Claudia Meyer Revermann

Tax, Wills, Family Law, Guardianships & Conservatorships
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  23 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Sauk Rapids Tax Lawyers and Sauk Rapids Tax Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Tax practice areas such as Corporate Tax, Income Tax, Sales & Use Tax and Tax Litigation matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Schober v. Commissioner of Revenue

... Schober next argues that the Commissioner's sales tax assessment violates 293 the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment and the Uniformity Clause of Article X of the Minnesota Constitution because it constitutes double taxation, and the Commissioner should ...

HealthEast v. County of Ramsey

... its real property housing the Bethesda Clinic. HealthEast and University of Minnesota Physicians contend that the subject real property is exempt from taxation under Minn.Stat. § 273.19 (2008). At the time of the assessments ...

Sytsma v. Commissioner of Revenue

... previously paid for tax years 2006-2008. Because we find no merit to appellant's argument that, as a private employee, he is not subject to income taxation, we affirm. DECISION. The district court may grant summary judgment ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.