within 15 miles of Arden Hills practice in Intellectual Property Minnesota

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Essien Law Office, PLLC

Intellectual Property, Business Organization, International Trade

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Lommen Abdo Law Firm

Intellectual Property, Dispute Resolution, Family Law, Divorce, Estate

Lawyer.com Featured 

CONTACT

Mansfield Tanick And Cohen PA

Employment, Estate, Intellectual Property, Industry Specialties, Business

Merchant & Gould PC

Patent, Trademark, Intellectual Property, Industry Specialties, Lawsuit & Dispute

Wayne B Holstad Plc

Foreclosure, Intellectual Property, Land Use & Zoning, Real Estate, Education

Vidas Arrett & Steinkraus A Professional Association

Patent, Visa, Wills & Probate, Criminal, Intellectual Property

Ploen Law Firm P.C.

Intellectual Property

Ries Law PLLC

Corporate, Patent, Contract, Land Use & Zoning, Trademark

Woods Patent Law, P.A.

Patent, Intellectual Property


SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Swenson v. Bender

... After the review committee failed her dissertation, Swenson complained to Capella that Bender "sabotaged" her efforts to obtain a degree and that Bender stole her "intellectual property." Bender responded in kind, accusing Swenson of plagiarism in her dissertation. ...

CARDOT v. SYNESI GROUP, INC.

... [2]. On December 9, 2002, Cardot entered into an "Intellectual Property Agreement" (the IP agreement) with Synesi. ... In exchange, Cardot "assign[ed] and reaffirm[ed] the assignment to [Synesi] of any and all intellectual property . . . ...

CGH, INC. v. NASH FINCH, INC.

... Aronson v. Quick Point Pencil Co., 440 US 257, 262, 99 S. Ct. 1096, 1099 (1979). The federal patent system also seeks to promote national uniformity in the realm of intellectual property. Bonito Boats, Inc. v. Thunder Craft Boats, Inc., 489 US 141, 162, 109 S. Ct. 971, 983 (1989). ...

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.