Selma Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

JS Bin

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Michael Tillotson
About | Practice Areas
Tillotson & Martin, LLP
DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia Â» view map
Criminal Defense
Virginiaâ€™s Premier DWI/DUI Defense Firm

Michael C. Tillotson is the one to choose when it comes to DWI/DUI defense in Virginia.

800-878-1431
1. Michael Tillotson Newport News, VA
  Attorney at Law - VA, 1992
  William & Mary Law School J.D. 1990
2. AboutTillotson & Martin, LLP
  DWI/DUI Defense throughout the Entire Commonwealth of Virginia
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Criminal Defense
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jonathan Blair Tarris

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate

Jonathan grew up in Lexington, Virginia. After finishing his law degree at Washington & Lee University School of Law, Jonathan worked as a Contract Ne... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

540-319-4111

14 East Nelson Street, Lexington, VA 24450

Jonathan Blair Tarris

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Estate, Real Estate

Jonathan grew up in Lexington, Virginia. After finishing his law degree at Washington & Lee University School of Law, Jonathan worked as a Contract Ne... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

540-319-4111

111 East Main Street, Salem, VA 24153

David W Steidle

✓

Criminal, Divorce & Family Law, Accident & Injury, Estate

David Steidle's experience as a Prosecutor and Public Defender in the region has lent familiarity and given him the resources to represent clients in ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

540-397-3742

333 Church Ave SW, Roanoke, VA 24016

Sidney H. Kirstein

✓

Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Real Estate, Business

I first fell in love with the idea of becoming an attorney while watching fictional defense attorney Perry Mason on TV. Played by Raymond Burr, that c... (more)

CONTACT

800-971-0670

1319 Enterprise Dr, Lynchburg, VA 24502

Mark Joseph Peake

✓

Accident & Injury, Criminal, Traffic, Lawsuit & Dispute, Personal Injury

Mark Peake has been practicing law in the areas of personal injury, insurance defense, civil litigation, products liability, and criminal defense sinc... (more)

CONTACT

434-846-2731

2306 Atherholt Road, Lynchburg, VA 24501

Craig P. Tiller

Farms, Child Support, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Mass Torts

Status:

CONTACT

15421 Forest Road, Forest, VA 24551

B. Leigh Drewry

Adoption, Animal Bite, Criminal, Bankruptcy

Status:

CONTACT

105 Archway Court, Lynchburg, VA 24502

Robert C Hagan Jr.

Criminal, Personal Injury, Traffic, Family Law

Status:

CONTACT

2473 Roanoke, Daleville, VA 24083

Jonathan Seth Kurtin

Criminal, Family Law, Personal Injury, Divorce

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

26 Franklin Road SW, Roanoke, VA 24011

Richard L. Derrico

Construction Liens, Criminal, Corporate, Business Organization, Real Estate

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

30 Franklin Road SW, Roanoke, VA 24011

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

NOLLE PROSEQUI

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue... (more...)

Latin for 'we shall no longer prosecute.' At trial, this is an entry made on the record by a prosecutor in a criminal case stating that he will no longer pursue the matter. An entry of nolle prosequi may be made at any time after charges are brought and before a verdict is returned or a plea entered. Essentially, it is an admission on the part of the prosecution that some aspect of its case against the defendant has fallen apart. Most of the time, prosecutors need a judge's A1:C576 to 'nol-pros' a case. (See Federal Rule of Criminal Procedure 48a.) Abbreviated 'nol. pros.' or 'nol-pros.'

HOT PURSUIT

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and a... (more...)

An exception to the general rule that a police officer needs an arrest warrant before he can enter a home to make an arrest. If a felony has just occurred and an officer has chased a suspect to a private house, the officer can forcefully enter the house in order to prevent the suspect from escaping or hiding or destroying evidence.

IMPEACH

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he h... (more...)

(1) To discredit. To impeach a witness' credibility, for example, is to show that the witness is not believable. A witness may be impeached by showing that he has made statements that are inconsistent with his present testimony, or that he has a reputation for not being a truthful person. (2) The process of charging a public official, such as the President or a federal judge, with a crime or misconduct and removing the official from office.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CRIME

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defin... (more...)

A type of behavior that is has been defined by the state, as deserving of punishment which usually includes imprisonment. Crimes and their punishments are defined by Congress and state legislatures.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

PROSECUTE

When a local District Attorney, state Attorney General or federal United States Attorney brings a criminal case against a defendant.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

... Because the procedure provided in Code Â§ 19.2-187.1 adequately protects a criminal defendant's rights under the Confrontation Clause and because the defendants in these appeals failed to utilize that procedure, we conclude that they waived the challenges under the ...

McCain v. Com.

... 335, 340, 288 SE2d 475, 478 (1982). Under well-settled principles of law, police officers may stop a person for the purpose of investigating possible criminal behavior even though no probable cause exists for an arrest. Terry, 392 US at 22, 88 S.Ct. 1868. ...

McMorris v. Com.

... This was all contemporaneous. Therefore[,] the robbery statute applies." In refusing McMorris' petition for appeal, the Court of Appeals concluded that the evidence established that McMorris shared the criminal intent of those who did steal Ottey's telephone and other items. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Selma Criminal Lawyer, Virginia

Sponsored Law Firm

Tillotson & Martin, LLP

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jonathan Blair Tarris

Jonathan Blair Tarris

David W Steidle

Sidney H. Kirstein

Mark Joseph Peake

Craig P. Tiller

B. Leigh Drewry

Robert C Hagan Jr.

Jonathan Seth Kurtin

Richard L. Derrico

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

MCNAGHTEN RULE

NOLLE PROSEQUI

HOT PURSUIT

IMPEACH

BURDEN OF PROOF

CRIME

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

PROSECUTE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Magruder v. Com.

McCain v. Com.

McMorris v. Com.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS