Silverdale Child Support Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Karim A. Hamir
About | Practice Areas
The Cowlitz Law Group
111 W Columbia Way Suite 246 Vancouver, WA 98660» view map
Divorce & Family Law
Highly Trained & Engaged Professionals

The Cowlitz Law Group PLLC is a successful practice that is built upon providing its clients with personal service, measurable results that meet or exceed expectations.

800-957-9250
1. Karim A. Hamir Vancouver, WA
  Attorney at Law - WA, 2003
  Western Michigan University J.D.
2. AboutThe Cowlitz Law Group
  We earn the right to be the client's first choice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Anne M. Montgomery

Farms, Child Support, Adoption, Children's Rights, Federal

Status: Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

9657 Levin Rd Nw, Silverdale, WA 98383

Stacy D. Heard

Family Law, Divorce, Child Support, Child Custody

Status: Licensed: 26 Years

CONTACT

520 Pike St., Seattle, WA 98101

Marie White

Adoption, Child Support, Farms, Divorce

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

415 Sw 152Nd St, Seahurst, WA 98166

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

CONFINEMENT IN PRISON

In most states with fault divorce, grounds for a spouse not in prison to obtain a fault divorce if the other spouse has been imprisoned for a certain number of ... (more...)

In most states with fault divorce, grounds for a spouse not in prison to obtain a fault divorce if the other spouse has been imprisoned for a certain number of years.

RESPONDENT

A term used instead of defendant or appellee in some states -- especially for divorce and other family law cases -- to identify the party who is sued and must r... (more...)

A term used instead of defendant or appellee in some states -- especially for divorce and other family law cases -- to identify the party who is sued and must respond to the petitioner's complaint.

LEGAL RISK PLACEMENT

A type of adoption used by agencies to keep a child out of foster care during the adoption process. The child is placed with the adopting parents before the bir... (more...)

A type of adoption used by agencies to keep a child out of foster care during the adoption process. The child is placed with the adopting parents before the birthmother has legally given up her rights to raise the child. If she then decides not to relinquish her rights, the adopting parents must give the child back. This is a risk for the adopting parents, who may lose a child to whom they've become attached.

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (TRO)

An order that tells one person to stop harassing or harming another, issued after the aggrieved party appears before a judge. Once the TRO is issued, the court ... (more...)

An order that tells one person to stop harassing or harming another, issued after the aggrieved party appears before a judge. Once the TRO is issued, the court holds a second hearing where the other side can tell his story and the court can decide whether to make the TRO permanent by issuing an injunction. Although a TRO will often not stop an enraged spouse from acting violently, the police are more willing to intervene if the abused spouse has a TRO.

NEXT FRIEND

A person, usually a relative, who appears in court on behalf of a minor or incompetent plaintiff, but who is not a party to the lawsuit. For example, children a... (more...)

A person, usually a relative, who appears in court on behalf of a minor or incompetent plaintiff, but who is not a party to the lawsuit. For example, children are often represented in court by their parents as 'next friends.'

BEST INTERESTS (OF THE CHILD)

The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best inter... (more...)

The test that courts use when deciding who will take care of a child. For instance, an adoption is allowed only when a court declares it to be in the best interests of the child. Similarly, when asked to decide on custody issues in a divorce case, the judge will base his or her decision on the child's best interests. And the same test is used when judges decide whether a child should be removed from a parent's home because of neglect or abuse. Factors considered by the court in deciding the best interests of a child include: age and sex of the child mental and physical health of the child mental and physical health of the parents lifestyle and other social factors of the parents emotional ties between the parents and the child ability of the parents to provide the child with food, shelter, clothing and medical care established living pattern for the child concerning school, home, community and religious institution quality of schooling, and the child's preference.

DILUTION

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurr... (more...)

A situation in which a famous trademark or service mark is used in a context in which the mark's reputation for quality is tarnished or its distinction is blurred. In this case, trademark infringement exists even though there is no likelihood of customer confusion, which is usually required in cases of trademark infringement. For example, the use of the word Candyland for a pornographic site on the Internet was ruled to dilute the reputation of the Candyland mark for the well-known children's game, even though the traditional basis for trademark infringement (probable customer confusion) wasn't an issue.

MARITAL TERMINATION AGREEMENT

See divorce agreement.

COMPARABLE RECTITUDE

A doctrine that grants the spouse least at fault a divorce when both spouses have shown grounds for divorce. It is a response to an old common-law rule that pre... (more...)

A doctrine that grants the spouse least at fault a divorce when both spouses have shown grounds for divorce. It is a response to an old common-law rule that prevented a divorce when both spouses were at fault.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re Parentage of Fairbanks

... KULIK, J. Â¶ 1 In November 2004, Ritchie Norman filed a petition to modify the child support for his daughter Jayla. After filing the ... Security benefit award. The court determined that Mr. Norman had made an overpayment of child support. ...

In re Custody of CCM

... 12 The court also entered a judgment for back child support in the amounts of $14,000 against Pomiak and $23,000 against Spencer. ... The Mecums further contend that the trial court erred in entering the judgment for back child support against Pomiak. ...

In re Marriage of Krieger and Walker

... AGID, J. Â¶ 1 Marilyn Walker appeals the trial court's order setting child support at the advisory amount for combined monthly incomes over $7,000. ... We therefore hold that the trial court abused its discretion in setting child support at the advisory amount. Accordingly, we reverse. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Silverdale Child Support Lawyer, Washington

Sponsored Law Firm

The Cowlitz Law Group

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Anne M. Montgomery

Stacy D. Heard

Marie White

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

CONFINEMENT IN PRISON

RESPONDENT

LEGAL RISK PLACEMENT

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER (TRO)

NEXT FRIEND

BEST INTERESTS (OF THE CHILD)

DILUTION

MARITAL TERMINATION AGREEMENT

COMPARABLE RECTITUDE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

In re Parentage of Fairbanks

In re Custody of CCM

In re Marriage of Krieger and Walker

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS