Thomas Ryan | Cleveland Accident & Injury Lawyer

We assisted a family discover medical mistakes that led to the death of their mother/wife. The patient went to a hospital for a routine procedure. During the procedure, a mistake was made. The surgeon that caused the injury attempted to cover his tracks by transferring the patient to a hospital floor rather than the post-surgical floor. A few days after the surgery was performed, the patient began to show signs of infection, but they were ignored. Unfortunately, 2 weeks after the surgery, the patient died. We conducted a thorough investigation and determined that the hospital and the doctor were both negligent. Using our 50 years of combined experience, we were able to secure a settlement in excess of a million dollars.

Our practice has grown through word of mouth and our consistent attention to the clients needs. Each case is different and we remain involved in all stages of the process.

A proven track record of results. While no attorney can be 100% successful, it is important that they show commitment to the case and arent looking for a quick buck. Also, make sure the areas where the attorney practices is relevant to your issue. If an attorney primarily focuses upon divorce cases, a personal injury claim may be beyond their experience, which can have significant impact on the client's case resolution.

It is important to know the local judges, the opposing counsel, the jury makeup and also how similar cases have resolved in the recent past. A national law firm will not have this important information in determining the appropriate route to take with the client's case.

We discuss the facts of the case and can determine whether it is worthwhile to accept the case for handling. If the client has a viable case, we will schedule a time to meet with the client and go over the procedures and what to expect while their case or claim is pending.

We need the names of the potential defendants and the facts of the case. Dates are important, so make sure you have them written down.

We have the track record and experience to get positive results for our clients

• United States Patent and Trademark Office - Registered Patent Attorney
  United States Federal Court - Northern District of Ohio
  Federal Bar Admission - Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals

• Top 40 under 40, National Trial Lawyers Association, 2014
  Top 40 Lawyers Under 40, American Society of Legal Advocates, 2013
  Graduation with Honors in Chemistry, Ashland University, 2000

• O'Connor vs. Cleveland Clinic, et al. Practice Area: Medical Malpractice Outcome: Jury Verdict in favor of Plaintiff Description: Medical malpractice case involving partial paralysis to the right arm and hand caused by malpractice by the hospital and its staff. Case was taken to trial and a verdict of approximately $950,000.00 was reached on behalf of our client. The case was affirmed on appeal and the Ohio Supreme Court denied to accept jurisdiction. Zachefsky v. Bowyer Practice Area: Personal Injury Outcome: Jury Verdict in Favor of Plaintiff Description: Assault of Plaintiff by the Defendant. Plaintiff had permanent damage to his neck and throat. The defendant denied assaulting the plaintiff. Case went to trial and required several medical experts to present the medical testimony. Jury returned a verdict in favor of the plaintiff. The parties reached a settlement amount after the jury verdict. Estate of John Doe v. Unnamed Hospital Practice Area: Medical Malpractice Outcome: Substantial Settlement in Favor of Plaintiffs Description: We assisted a family to investigate and discover the cause of their father's death. The medical provider that treated the decedent had a history of substance abuse and there was a question regarding whether they were under the influence at the time of the medical treatment. We were able to demonstrate that a jury would find that the provider was under the influence at the time of the medical treatment. The hospital and practitioner settled with the family for an undisclosed, substantial monetary amount, in a confidential settlement agreement. Harrison v. Kolo Practice Area: Personal Injury Outcome: Substantial Settlement in Plaintiff's Favor Description: Pedestrian struck by security guard travelling in vehicle. Plaintiff suffered significant injuries to head, neck, back, and knee. Case was resolved shortly after filing a complaint

• USENIX/ACCURATE Electronic Voting Technology Workshop, GEMS Tabulation Database Design Issues in Relation to Voting Systems Certification Standards, 2007

• Verdicts & Settlements
• Contact Me
• Blog
• For more information about Thomas Ryan
• Law Firm Home Page
• LinkedIn