Topinabee Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Akiva Goldman
About | Practice Areas
Goldman & Associates
615 Griswold St. Suite 1325 Detroit, MI 48226» view map
Probate
Over 30 Years Experience

Accessibility, responsiveness, and personal commitment is our approach to client representation.

800-797-8031
1. Akiva Goldman Detroit, MI
  Attorney at Law - MI, 1986
  Wayne State University J.D. 1986
2. AboutGoldman & Associates
  Our firm has quick and easy access to all courts in the metro Detroit area.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Probate
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Alfred E. Feleppa

Landlord-Tenant, Immigration, Estate, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Cheboygan, MI 49721

Joseph P. Kwiatkowski

Real Estate, Criminal, Business, Accident & Injury

Status: Licensed: 45 Years

CONTACT

11512 N. Straits Highway, Cheboygan, MI 49721

William L. Keogh

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 23 Years

CONTACT

218 N Main St, Cheboygan, MI 49721

Donna L. Hansel

Immigration, Family Law, Criminal, Car Accident

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

521 Stempkey St, Cheboygan, MI 49721

Bryan C. Klawuhn

Criminal, DUI-DWI

Status: Licensed: 25 Years

CONTACT

2115 N US Highway 31, Petoskey, MI 49770

Allen J. Nelson

Dispute Resolution, Estate Planning, Criminal, Elder Law

Status: Licensed: 61 Years

CONTACT

768 Woodhill Rd, Harbor Springs, MI 49740

Daniel J. Hartman

Criminal, Accident & Injury, Divorce & Family Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

Petoskey, MI 49770

Adam Raymond Cross

Other, Real Estate, Pharmaceutical Product, Criminal, Bankruptcy & Debt

Status: Licensed: 11 Years

CONTACT

3319 Lakeside Dr South, Petoskey, MI 49770

Susan G. Graham

Criminal, Family Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

2115 N US Highway 31, Petoskey, MI 49770

Jennifer Edwards Deegan

Family Law, Divorce & Family Law, Criminal, Children's Rights

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

200 Division St, Petoskey, MI 49770

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the... (more...)

A ruling by a judge, typically made after the plaintiff has presented all of her evidence but before the defendant puts on his case, that awards judgment to the defendant. A directed verdict is usually made because the judge concludes the plaintiff has failed to offer the minimum amount of evidence to prove her case even if there were no opposition. In other words, the judge is saying that, as a matter of law, no reasonable jury could decide in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, a directed verdict is a judgement of acquittal for the defendant.

IMPRISON

To put a person in prison or jail or otherwise confine him as punishment for committing a crime.

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false --... (more...)

A signed statement, sworn to be true by the signer, that will make the signer guilty of the crime of perjury if the statement is shown to be materially false -- that is, the lie is relevant and significant to the case.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his ac... (more...)

A seldom-used test for criminal insanity that labels the person insane if he could not control his actions when committing the crime, even though he knew his actions were wrong.

SPECIFIC INTENT

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of ... (more...)

An intent to produce the precise consequences of the crime, including the intent to do the physical act that causes the consequences. For example, the crime of larceny is the taking of the personal property of another with the intent to permanently deprive the other person of the property. A person is not guilty of larceny just because he took someone else's property; it must be proven that he took it with the purpose of keeping it permanently.

HUNG JURY

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations ... (more...)

A jury unable to come to a final decision, resulting in a mistrial. Judges do their best to avoid hung juries, typically sending juries back into deliberations with an assurance (sometimes known as a 'dynamite charge') that they will be able to reach a decision if they try harder. If a mistrial is declared, the case is tried again unless the parties settle the case (in a civil case) or the prosecution dismisses the charges or offers a plea bargain (in a criminal case).

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

... PER CURIAM. We granted leave to appeal in this case to consider whether offense variable 9 (number of victims) (OV 9) can be scored using uncharged acts that did not occur during the same criminal transaction as the sentencing offenses. ...

People v. Petri

... Following a jury trial, defendant was convicted of second-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520c(1)(a) (sexual contact with a person under 13), and was sentenced as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to imprisonment for a minimum of 14 years and 10 ...

People v. Horn

... A jury convicted defendant of kidnapping, MCL 750.349, and four counts of first-degree criminal sexual conduct, MCL 750.520b. The trial court sentenced defendant as a second-offense habitual offender, MCL 769.10, to five concurrent sentences of 40 to 60 years in prison. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Topinabee Criminal Lawyer, Michigan

Sponsored Law Firm

Goldman & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Alfred E. Feleppa

Joseph P. Kwiatkowski

William L. Keogh

Donna L. Hansel

Bryan C. Klawuhn

Allen J. Nelson

Daniel J. Hartman

Adam Raymond Cross

Susan G. Graham

Jennifer Edwards Deegan

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

DIRECTED VERDICT

IMPRISON

CRIMINAL INSANITY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

DECLARATION UNDER PENALTY OF PERJURY

ARREST WARRANT

IRRESISTIBLE IMPULSE TEST

SPECIFIC INTENT

HUNG JURY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Sargent

People v. Petri

People v. Horn

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS