Wildomar Intellectual Property Lawyer, California

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Dennis Windsor Beech

Intellectual Property
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  43 Years

Austen Pell

Construction, Intellectual Property, Contract, Business
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  27 Years

Theodore James Leitereg

Intellectual Property
Status:  Inactive *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  50 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Lawyer.com can help you easily and quickly find Wildomar Intellectual Property Lawyers and Wildomar Intellectual Property Law Firms. Refine your search by specific Intellectual Property practice areas such as Copyright, International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark matters.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

City of Hope Nat. Med. Center v. Genentech

... supra, 107 Cal.App.4th 25, 130 Cal.Rptr.2d 860, that fiduciary obligations are not necessarily created when one party entrusts valuable intellectual property to another for commercial development in exchange for the payment of compensation contingent on commercial success. ...

FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Parrish

... In 2004, FLIR purchased Indigo for approximately $185 million, acquiring Indigo's patents, technology, and intellectual property. ... The production startup time would be quick, assuming respondents could acquire technology licenses and intellectual property from a third party. ...

KC Multimedia, Inc. v. Bank of America Technology & Operations, Inc.

... (Ibid.) "The stated purpose of the UTSA is to provide `unitary definitions of trade secret and trade secret misappropriation, and a single statute of limitations for the various property, quasi-contractual, and violation of fiduciary relationship theories of noncontractual liability utilized ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.