Putnam Hall Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Adrian Middleton
About | Practice Areas
Sword & Shield, P.A.
1437 Market St Tallahassee, FL 32312» view map
Criminal Defense Law
Legal Representation You Can Trust

Our team of attorneys has the experience and creativity that will provide you with an outcome that will not hurt your rights or your future.

800-978-7301
1. Adrian Middleton Tallahassee, FL
  Attorney at Law- FL, 2012
  Florida State University College of Law, J.D. 2012
2. AboutSword & Shield, P.A.
  Legal Representation You Can Trust
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Divorce & Family
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

David P. Salter

Family Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Business Organization

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

3940 NW 16th Blvd., Bldg. B, Gainesville, FL 32635

Paul B. Brockway

Criminal, DUI-DWI, Insurance, Litigation

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

1110 N.W. 6th St., Gainesville, FL 32601

John Walter Stephenson

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

196 Cue Lake Dr, Hawthorne, FL 32640

John David Middleton

Child Support, Divorce & Family Law, DUI-DWI, Accident & Injury

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 48 Years

CONTACT

304 State Road 26, Melrose, FL 32666

Richard Tydings Hodges

Mediation, Workers' Compensation, DUI-DWI, Wrongful Death

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 43 Years

CONTACT

6218 Centre St, Melrose, FL 32666

Elizabeth Ruszczyk White

Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Elder Law, Life & Health

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 24 Years

CONTACT

3952 Se 20Th Ave, Keystone Heights, FL 32656

Eddie Lee Edwards

Criminal, Merger & Acquisition

Status: In Good Standing

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

David Paul Salter

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 28 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

Susan Anderson Ward

General Practice

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 31 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

Curtis Alexis Sanders

Criminal

Status: In Good Standing Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

Starke, FL 32091

800-923-0641

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

Call me for fastest results!
800-943-8690

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-943-8690

By submitting this lawyer request, I confirm I have read and agree to the Consent to Receive Messages from all messaging and voice technologies including Email, Text, Phone, Terms of Use, and Privacy Policy. Information provided is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced '... (more...)

The burden of proof that the prosecution must carry in a criminal trial to obtain a guilty verdict. Reasonable doubt is sometimes explained as being convinced 'to a moral certainty.' The jury must be convinced that the defendant committed each element of the crime before returning a guilty verdict.

ARREST WARRANT

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to ... (more...)

A document issued by a judge or magistrate that authorizes the police to arrest someone. Warrants are issued when law enforcement personnel present evidence to the judge or magistrate that convinces her that it is reasonably likely that a crime has taken place and that the person to be named in the warrant is criminally responsible for that crime.

PLEA BARGAIN

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crim... (more...)

A negotiation between the defense and prosecution (and sometimes the judge) that settles a criminal case. The defendant typically pleads guilty to a lesser crime (or fewer charges) than originally charged, in exchange for a guaranteed sentence that is shorter than what the defendant could face if convicted at trial. The prosecution gets the certainty of a conviction and a known sentence; the defendant avoids the risk of a higher sentence; and the judge gets to move on to other cases.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

CRIMINAL INSANITY

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right... (more...)

A mental defect or disease that makes it impossible for a person to understand the wrongfulness of his acts or, even if he understands them, to ditinguish right from wrong. Defendants who are criminally insane cannot be convicted of a crime, since criminal conduct involves the conscious intent to do wrong -- a choice that the criminally insane cannot meaningfully make. See also irresistible impulse; McNaghten Rule.

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or j... (more...)

Evidence that proves a fact by means of an inference. For example, from the evidence that a person was seen running away from the scene of a crime, a judge or jury may infer that the person committed the crime.

PLEA

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usual... (more...)

The defendant's formal answer to criminal charges. Typically defendants enter one of the following pleas: guilty, not guilty or nolo contendere. A plea is usually entered when charges are formally brought (at arraignment).

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

... convictions for discharging a firearm from a vehicle within 1000 feet of a person in violation of section 790.15(2), Florida Statutes (2003), and shooting into an occupied vehicle in violation of section 790.19, Florida Statutes (2003), arising from the same criminal episode, violate ...

State v. Meshell

... 1) and for oral sex (Count 3) violated double jeopardy. Because these are distinct criminal acts, we agree with the State that there is no double jeopardy violation. Although the Fifth District reversed the trial court's judgment, holding ...

Jackson v. State

... CANTERO, J. In this case, we decide whether a trial court's consideration, for sentencing purposes, of victim impact testimony without defense counsel present is a sentencing error as contemplated by rule 3.800(b), Florida Rules of Criminal Procedure. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Putnam Hall Criminal Lawyer, Florida

Sponsored Law Firm

Sword & Shield, P.A.

SPONSORED LAWYERS

David P. Salter

Paul B. Brockway

John Walter Stephenson

John David Middleton

Richard Tydings Hodges

Elizabeth Ruszczyk White

Eddie Lee Edwards

David Paul Salter

Susan Anderson Ward

Curtis Alexis Sanders

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

BEYOND A REASONABLE DOUBT

ARREST WARRANT

PLEA BARGAIN

ACTUS REUS

CRIMINAL INSANITY

CIRCUMSTANTIAL EVIDENCE

PLEA

CAPITAL CASE

EAVESDROPPING

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Valdes v. State

State v. Meshell

Jackson v. State

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS

Lawyer.com Legal Protection Plan

Premium Membership

Additional Services

Resources

My Account Details