Catalina Criminal Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Zachary Mushkatel
About | Practice Areas
Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
15249 N. 99th Ave Sun City, AZ 85351» view map
Accident & Injury Law
Get Solutions To Your Legal Problems

At Mushkatel, Robbins & Becker, PLLC, our goal is to provide you with a comfortable environment where you can get trusted guidance on the legal matters affecting your life.

800-895-6240
1. Zachary Mushkatel Sun City, AZ
  Attorney at Law - AZ, 2004
  University of Minnesota J.D. 2004
2. AboutMushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC
  Dedicated to Justice!
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Evelyn Agnes Burns

General Practice

Status: Licensed: 38 Years

CONTACT

37874 S Niblick Dr, Tucson, AZ 85739

William Marion Duncan

Criminal

Status: Licensed: 37 Years

CONTACT

36474 S Desert Sun Dr, Tucson, AZ 85739

Christopher Ryan Hays

Immigration, Divorce, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 13 Years

CONTACT

20 E Peralta Canyon Ct, Tucson, AZ 85755

Katherine Adamson Estavillo

Criminal, Personal Injury, Federal Trial Practice

Status: Licensed: 18 Years

CONTACT

1846 E Innovation Park Dr, Tucson, AZ 85755

Bryan K Hanks

Litigation, Employment Discrimination, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

12860 N. Camino Vieja Rancheria, Tucson, AZ 85755

David Maldonado

Criminal, State Government, Litigation

Status: Licensed: 34 Years

CONTACT

1900 N. La Canada Drive, Tucson, AZ 85737

Richard S. Burris

Criminal, Car Accident, Business, Business & Trade, Other

Status: Licensed: 20 Years

CONTACT

2140 E Buck Ridge Pl, Tucson, AZ 85737

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal, Personal Injury

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Raul A Miranda

Other, Federal Appellate Practice, Criminal, Administrative Law

Status: Licensed: 29 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Federal Appellate Practice, Juvenile Law, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

CONTACT

10645 N Oracle Rd, Tucson, AZ 85737

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communicatio... (more...)

The privilege that allows the president and other high officials of the executive branch to keep certain communications private if disclosing those communications would disrupt the functions or decisionmaking processes of the executive branch. As demonstrated by the Watergate hearings, this privilege does not extend to information germane to a criminal investigation.

BATTERY

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how... (more...)

A crime consisting of physical contact that is intended to harm someone. Unintentional harmful contact is not battery, no mater how careless the behavior or how severe the injury. A fist fight is a common battery; being hit by a wild pitch in a baseball game is not.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

ACTUS REUS

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For ... (more...)

Latin for a 'guilty act.' The actus reus is the act which, in combination with a certain mental state, such as intent or recklessness, constitutes a crime. For example, the crime of theft requires physically taking something (the actus reus) coupled with the intent to permanently deprive the owner of the object (the mental state, or mens rea).

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

VENIREMEN

People who are summoned to the courthouse so that they may be questioned and perhaps chosen as jurors in trials of civil or criminal cases.

CRIMINAL CASE

A lawsuit brought by a prosecutor employed by the federal, state or local government that charges a person with the commission of a crime.

ACCESSORY

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An acces... (more...)

Someone who intentionally helps another person commit a felony by giving advice before the crime or helping to conceal the evidence or the perpetrator. An accessory is usually not physically present during the crime. For example, hiding a robber who is being sought by the police might make you an 'accessory after the fact' to a robbery. Compare accomplice.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Valverde

... Supreme Court of Arizona, En Banc. June 3, 2009. 234 Terry Goddard, Arizona Attorney General By Kent E. Cattani, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals/Capital Litigation Section, Joseph T. Maziarz, Assistant Attorney General, Phoenix, Attorneys for State of Arizona. ...

State v. Klokic

... April 29, 2008. Review Denied October 28, 2008. 845 Terry Goddard, Attorney General by Randall M. Howe, Chief Counsel, Criminal Appeals Section and Karla Hotis Delord, Assistant Attorney General Attorneys, Phoenix, for Appellee. ...

Patterson v. Mahoney

... 1 The issue in this special action is whether the trial court erred when it ruled that the siblings of the decedent in a murder trial were not victims exempt from the rule governing the exclusion of witnesses pursuant to Arizona Rules of Criminal Procedure 9.3(a) and 39(a). ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Catalina Criminal Lawyer, Arizona

Sponsored Law Firm

Mushkatel Robbins & Becker PLLC

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Evelyn Agnes Burns

William Marion Duncan

Christopher Ryan Hays

Katherine Adamson Estavillo

Bryan K Hanks

David Maldonado

Richard S. Burris

Cedric Martin Hopkins

Raul A Miranda

Cedric Martin Hopkins

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EXECUTIVE PRIVILEGE

BATTERY

MCNAGHTEN RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

ACTUS REUS

LINEUP

VENIREMEN

CRIMINAL CASE

ACCESSORY

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Valverde

State v. Klokic

Patterson v. Mahoney

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS