Danbury Employment Discrimination Lawyer, Connecticut

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Includes: Affirmative Action, Age Discrimination, Sex Discrimination

Tracy L. Norris

Health Care, Employment Discrimination, Civil Rights, Business
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Danbury Employment Discrimination Lawyers and Danbury Employment Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Employment areas including Employee Rights, Employment Contracts, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Labor Law, Occupational Safety & Health, Pension & Benefits, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Workers' Compensation and Wrongful Termination attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Kerrigan v. Commissioner of Public Health

... See General Statutes § § 46a-81a through 46a-81n (generally banning sexual orientation discrimination in employment, trade and professional association membership, public accommodations, housing, credit practices, state hiring practices, state licensing practices and ...

Lyon v. Jones

... Geraldine D. Lyon, appealed 419 from the judgment of the Appellate Court affirming the judgment of the trial court, claiming that the Appellate Court incorrectly interpreted General Statutes §§ 46a-60 and 46a-70 as barring the plaintiff's employment discrimination action under ...

McWeeny v. City of Hartford

... concluded that only an employee or prospective employee who has suffered an injury due to an alleged discriminatory employment practice by his or her employer or 865 prospective employer has standing under § 46a-60(a)(1) to bring an employment discrimination claim. ...

© 2025 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.