Decatur Copyright Lawyer, Illinois, page 2

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Sponsored Law Firm


Rusty Freeland

International Tax, Intellectual Property
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  40 Years

Matthew Deering

Real Estate, International Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property, Transactions
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           Licensed:  29 Years

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Decatur Copyright Lawyers and Decatur Copyright Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Intellectual Property areas including International Intellectual Property, Patent and Trademark attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Cincinnati Ins. Co. v. American Hardware Manufacturers Ass'n

... c. Misappropriation of advertising ideas or style of doing business; or. d. Infringement of copyright, title or slogan. Advertising means an advertisement, publicity article, broadcast or telecast. * * *. 12. ... I. Infringement of Copyright, Patent, Trademark or Trade Secret. ...

People v. Williams

... The appellate court found that the antipiracy provision was preempted by the federal Copyright Act of 1976, but it then rejected due process and first amendment challenges to the constitutionality of the labeling provision, which proscribes use of unidentified sound recordings. ...

MYODA COMPUTER CTR. v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUT.

... Section II of the policy included coverage for "advertising injury," which was defined as "injury arising out of one or more of the following offenses: * * * infringement of copyright, title, or slogan." The policy also included the following provision: ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.