Irmo Discrimination Lawyer, South Carolina

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Race Discrimination, Religious Discrimination

Robert Tyson

Energy, Legislative Practice, Religious Discrimination, Business
Status:  In Good Standing *Status is reviewed annually. For latest information visit here           

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Irmo Discrimination Lawyers and Irmo Discrimination Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Civil & Human Rights areas including Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Elder Law and Native People attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

State v. Edwards

... The trial judge's findings of purposeful discrimination rest largely on his evaluation of demeanor and credibility. ... The State bore the burden of demonstrating that these proffered explanations were pretext for racial discrimination. ...

McCrea v. Gheraibeh

... Rather, following the lead of Purkett, this Court declared that the second step of a Batson inquiry only required that counsel's explanation be race-neutral in order to ensure that the burden of showing purposeful discrimination remains at all times on the opponent of the strike. Id. ...

McCrea v. GHERAIBEH

... Rather, following the lead of Purkett, this Court declared that the second step of a Batson inquiry only required that counsel's explanation be race-neutral in order to ensure that the burden of showing purposeful discrimination remains at all times on the opponent of the strike. Id. ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.