Pauma Valley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Elliott N. Kanter
About | Practice Areas
The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
2445 5th Avenue Suite 350 San Diego, CA 92101» view map
Accident & Injury Law
When Experience Matters Most

San Diego attorney Elliott Kanter has served criminal defense and personal injury clients for 40 years. Get compassionate legal service.

800-641-9290
1. Elliott N. Kanter San Diego, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1980
  Thomas Jefferson School of Law J.D.
2. AboutThe Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter
  When Experience Matters Most
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Accident & Injury Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Jacob Prescott Austin

✓

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Over the years I have worked on cases spanning many areas of law such as marriage dissolution issues, transferring trademarks, elder abuse, financial ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

866-366-8825

380 South Melrose Dr, Vista, CA 92081

Ashby Clark Sorensen

✓

Criminal, Felony, DUI-DWI, Misdemeanor

Defense lawyer, Ashby C. Sorensen was born and raised in Virginia just outside of our nation’s capital, Washington, D.C.. He is a graduate of Univer... (more)

CONTACT

760-815-4617

533 2Nd St, Encinitas, CA 92024

Jacob Prescott Austin

✓

Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Over the years I have worked on cases spanning many areas of law such as marriage dissolution issues, transferring trademarks, elder abuse, financial ... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

866-366-8825

1455 Frazee Rd, San Diego, CA 92108

Elliott N. Kanter

✓

Accident & Injury, Wrongful Death, Personal Injury, DUI-DWI, Felony

Representing Injured persons and those accursed of Crimes since 1980

If you're seeking a criminal defense attorney or personal injury lawyer in San Diego who will look out for your best interests, you've come to the rig... (more)

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

800-641-9290

2445 5th Avenue, San Diego, CA 92101

Emily Ann Benjamini

Juvenile Law, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal, Social Security

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

41-625 Eclectic Street, Palm Desert, CA 92260

Richard L Duquette

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

3642 Ocean Ranch Blvd, Oceanside, CA 92056

Richard L Duquette

Litigation, Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 42 Years

CONTACT

3642 Ocean Ranch Blvd., Oceanside, CA 92056

Mark Lawrence Deniz

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 22 Years

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

2831 Camino Del Rio S, San Diego, CA 92108

Eduard Lazar

Misdemeanor, Felony, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status: Licensed: 19 Years

CONTACT

x, San Clemente, CA 92674

J.K. Moran

DUI-DWI, Criminal, Felony, Misdemeanor

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

777 Tahquitz Cyn Way, Palm Springs, CA 92262

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or bi... (more...)

Listening to conversations or observing conduct which is meant to be private, typically by using devices that amplify sound or light, such as stethoscopes or binoculars. The term comes from the common law offense of listening to private conversations by crouching under the windows or eaves of a house. Nowadays, eavesdropping includes using electronic equipment to intercept telephone or other wire communications, or radio equipment to intercept broadcast communications. Generally, the term 'eavesdropping' is used when the activity is not legally authorized by a search warrant or court order; and the term 'surveillance' is used when the activity is permitted by law. Compare electronic surveillance.

SELF-INCRIMINATION

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the go... (more...)

The making of statements that might expose you to criminal prosecution, either now or in the future. The 5th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution prohibits the government from forcing you to provide evidence (as in answering questions) that would or might lead to your prosecution for a crime.

MISTRIAL

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on ... (more...)

A trial that ends prematurely and without a judgment, due either to a mistake that jeopardizes a party's right to a fair trial or to a jury that can't agree on a verdict (a hung jury) If a judge declares a mistrial in a civil case, he or she will direct that the case be set for a new trial at a future date. Mistrials in criminal cases can result in a retrial, a plea bargain or a dismissal of the charges.

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from ... (more...)

A rule of evidence that disallows the use of illegally obtained evidence in criminal trials. For example, the exclusionary rule would prevent a prosecutor from introducing at trial evidence seized during an illegal search.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

SEARCH WARRANT

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue... (more...)

An order signed by a judge that directs owners of private property to allow the police to enter and search for items named in the warrant. The judge won't issue the warrant unless she has been convinced that there is probable cause for the search -- that reliable evidence shows that it's more likely than not that a crime has occurred and that the items sought by the police are connected with it and will be found at the location named in the warrant. In limited situations the police may search without a warrant, but they cannot use what they find at trial if the defense can show that there was no probable cause for the search.

INSANITY

See criminal insanity.

CAPITAL CASE

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecuto... (more...)

A prosecution for murder in which the jury is also asked to decide if the defendant is guilty and, if he is, whether he should be put to death. When a prosecutor brings a capital case (also called a death penalty case), she must charge one or more 'special circumstances' that the jury must find to be true in order to sentence the defendant to death. Each state (and the federal government) has its own list of special circumstances, but common ones include multiple murders, use of a bomb or a finding that the murder was especially heinous, atrocious or cruel.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

... II. DISCUSSION. A. The Constitutionality of the Second Degree Felony-murder Rule. ... The second degree felony-murder rule is based on statute and, accordingly, stands on firm constitutional ground. [4]. B. The Merger Doctrine and Second Degree Felony Murder. ...

People v. Albillar

... The remaining issues involve the enhancement defined by Penal Code section 186.22, subdivision (b)(1) (section 186.22(b)(1)), which adds specified penalties for "any person who is convicted of a felony committed for the benefit of, at the direction of, or in association with any ...

People v. Delgado

... 1063 OPINION. BAXTER, J. After a jury convicted defendant of felony offenses, a court trial was held on the allegation, for purposes of enhancing his sentence, that he had a prior serious felony conviction. ... other than a firearm." Only the latter version qualifies as a serious felony. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Pauma Valley Felony Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

The Law Office of Elliott N. Kanter

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Jacob Prescott Austin

Ashby Clark Sorensen

Jacob Prescott Austin

Elliott N. Kanter

Emily Ann Benjamini

Richard L Duquette

Richard L Duquette

Mark Lawrence Deniz

Eduard Lazar

J.K. Moran

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

EAVESDROPPING

SELF-INCRIMINATION

MISTRIAL

EXCLUSIONARY RULE

BURDEN OF PROOF

SEARCH WARRANT

INSANITY

CAPITAL CASE

MCNAGHTEN RULE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Chun

People v. Albillar

People v. Delgado

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS