Pauma Valley Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

x
Click For More Info:

Vincent Davis
About | Practice Areas
Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
150 N. Santa Anita Ave, Suite 200 Arcadia, CA 91006» view map
Juvenile Dependency Law, Delinquency
Advocating On Your Behalf

If you are seeking an experienced juvenile law attorney to represent you, count on the Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis.

626-446-6442
1. Vincent Davis Arcadia, CA
  Attorney at Law - CA, 1986
  Loyola Marymount, J.D., 1986
2. AboutLaw Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates
  Over 20 years of experience.
3. Practice AreasExpertise
  Juvenile Dependency Law
1. Contact
2. Email
3. Refer
5. Visit:
6. Website
7. Profile

Peter Michael Liss

Juvenile Law, Domestic Violence & Neglect, , Firearms, DUI-DWI

Status:

CONTACT

380 South Melrose Drive, Vista, CA 92081

Joseph Vincent Camarata

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

41715 Enterprise Circle North, Temecula, CA 92590

Margie Brakhage

Juvenile Law, Traffic, Divorce, DUI-DWI

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

29995 Technology Drive, Murrieta, CA 92563

Parwana Anwar

Domestic Violence & Neglect, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, Criminal

Status:

CONTACT

38975 Sky Canyon Dr., Murrieta, CA 92563

Nicolai Cocis

Criminal, Juvenile Law, DUI-DWI, White Collar Crime

Status:

FREE CONSULTATION

CONTACT

25026 Las Brisas Rd., Murrieta, CA 92562

Jamila Teri Lindsey-Purnell

Other, Juvenile Law

Status: Licensed: 21 Years

CONTACT

30755 Auld Rd, Murrieta, CA 92563

800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

LEGAL TERMS

HOMICIDE

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncrim... (more...)

The killing of one human being by the act or omission of another. The term applies to all such killings, whether criminal or not. Homicide is considered noncriminal in a number of situations, including deaths as the result of war and putting someone to death by the valid sentence of a court. Killing may also be legally justified or excused, as it is in cases of self-defense or when someone is killed by another person who is attempting to prevent a violent felony. Criminal homicide occurs when a person purposely, knowingly, recklessly or negligently causes the death of another. Murder and manslaughter are both examples of criminal homicide.

LINEUP

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the c... (more...)

A procedure in which the police place a suspect in a line with a group of other people and ask an eyewitness to the crime to identify the person he saw at the crime scene. The police are supposed to choose similar-looking people to appear with the suspect. If the suspect alone matches the physical description of the perpetrator, evidence of the identification can be attacked at trial. For example, if the robber is described as a Latino male, and the suspect, a Latino male, is placed in a lineup with ten white males, a witness' identification of him as the robber will be challenged by the defense attorney.

MCNAGHTEN RULE

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wron... (more...)

The earliest and most common test for criminal insanity, in which a criminal defendant is judged legally insane only if he could not distinguish right from wrong at the time he committed the crime. For example, a delusional psychotic who believed that his assaultive acts were in response to the will of God would not be criminally responsible for his acts.

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent ... (more...)

Intentionally restraining another person without having the legal right to do so. It's not necessary that physical force be used; threats or a show of apparent authority are sufficient. False imprisonment is a misdemeanor and a tort (a civil wrong). If the perpetrator confines the victim for a substantial period of time (or moves him a significant distance) in order to commit a felony, the false imprisonment may become a kidnapping. People who are arrested and get the charges dropped, or are later acquitted, often think that they can sue the arresting officer for false imprisonment (also known as false arrest). These lawsuits rarely succeed: As long as the officer had probable cause to arrest the person, the officer will not be liable for a false arrest, even if it turns out later that the information the officer relied upon was incorrect.

INTERROGATION

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligat... (more...)

A term that describes vigorous questioning, usually by the police of a suspect in custody. Other than providing his name and address, the suspect is not obligated to answer the questions, and the fact that he has remained silent generally cannot be used by the prosecution to help prove that he is guilty of a crime. If the suspect has asked for a lawyer, the police must cease questioning. If they do not, they cannot use the answers against the suspect at trial.

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does n... (more...)

A legal doctrine that prevents legislators from being sued for actions performed and decisions made in the course of serving in government. This doctrine does not protect legislators from criminal prosecution, nor does it relieve them from responsibility for actions outside the scope of their office, such as the nefarious activities of former Senator Bob Packwood.

BURDEN OF PROOF

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convi... (more...)

A party's job of convincing the decisionmaker in a trial that the party's version of the facts is true. In a civil trial, it means that the plaintiff must convince the judge or jury 'by a preponderance of the evidence' that the plaintiff's version is true -- that is, over 50% of the believable evidence is in the plaintiff's favor. In a criminal case, because a person's liberty is at stake, the government has a harder job, and must convince the judge or jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the defendant is guilty.

CORPUS DELECTI

Latin for the 'body of the crime.' Used to describe physical evidence, such as the corpse of a murder victim or the charred frame of a torched building.

INDECENT EXPOSURE

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that ... (more...)

Revealing one's genitals under circumstances likely to offend others. Exposure is indecent under the law whenever a reasonable person would or should know that his act may be seen by others--for example, in a public place or through an open window--and that it is likely to cause affront or alarm. Indecent exposure is considered a misdemeanor in most states.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

... Jonathan Laba; Maureen Pacheco; Marsha Levick; Neha Desai; and Jessica Feierman for Pacific Juvenile Defender Center, Juvenile Law Center, Juvenile Division of the Los Angeles Public Defender, Alternate Public Defender, National Center for Youth Law and Youth Law ...

In re SB

164 Cal.App.4th 289 (2008). In re SB, a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. SAN DIEGO COUNTY HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES AGENCY, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. MICHAEL B., Defendant and Appellant. No. D052202. ...

In re Alexis E.

171 Cal.App.4th 438 (2009). In re ALEXIS E. et al., Persons Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. ... In this dependency case (Welf. & Inst. Code, Â§ 300 et seq.), [1] Patrick E., father of three dependent minor children (Father), appeals from a judgment of the juvenile court. ...

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

Free Consultation
Male
Female
Suspended

Pauma Valley Juvenile Law Lawyer, California

Sponsored Law Firm

Law Offices of Vincent W. Davis & Associates

SPONSORED LAWYERS

Peter Michael Liss

Joseph Vincent Camarata

Margie Brakhage

Parwana Anwar

Nicolai Cocis

Jamila Teri Lindsey-Purnell

TIPS

LEGAL TERMS

HOMICIDE

LINEUP

MCNAGHTEN RULE

FALSE IMPRISONMENT

INTERROGATION

LEGISLATIVE IMMUNITY

BURDEN OF PROOF

CORPUS DELECTI

INDECENT EXPOSURE

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

People v. Nguyen

In re SB

In re Alexis E.

SORT BY:

FILTER BY:

PRACTICE AREAS 30

NEARBY CITY SUGGESTIONS