Stoneham Labor Law Lawyer, Maine

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.


Includes: Collective Bargaining, Labor Arbitration, Labor Disputes, Labor Legislation, Unfair Labor Practices, Unions


Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

Member Representative

Call me for fastest results!
800-814-6700

Free Help: Use This Form or Call 800-814-6700

By submitting this request, I authorize you to forward my information to multiple potential lawyers and I agree to your Terms of Use and Privacy Policy including the Consent to Receive Automated Phone Calls, Emails and Texts. Information you provide is not privileged or confidential.

Lawyer.com

TIPS

Easily find Stoneham Labor Law Lawyers and Stoneham Labor Law Firms. For more attorneys, search all Employment areas including Employee Rights, Employment Contracts, Employment Discrimination, Family Medical Leave Act (FMLA), Occupational Safety & Health, Pension & Benefits, Sexual Harassment, Whistleblower, Workers' Compensation and Wrongful Termination attorneys.

SAMPLE LEGAL CASES

Bard v. Lord

... Lord contends that the court erred in using Department of Labor statistics in imputing income to him for the purpose of determining his child support obligation. ... [¶ 7] Lord contends only that the court erred in relying on Department of Labor statistics in imputing income to him. ...

County of Hancock v. Teamsters Union

... [¶ 2] The Union asserts that the court erred in concluding that the Municipal Public Employees Labor Relations Act, 26 MRS §§ 961, 962(6)(F) (2009), excluded the two employees from the protections of the collective bargaining agreement and therefore precluded consideration ...

Avramovic v. RC MOORE TRANSPORTATION, INC.

... what IDI would have Mr. Avramovic doing in the job." Thus, the hearing officer determined that the offer was not a bona fide offer of reasonable employment because RC Moore did not prove that the position offered is "one that is actually available in the competitive labor market ...

© 2024 LAWYER.COM INC.

Use of this website constitutes acceptance of Lawyer.com’s Terms of Use, Email, Phone, & Text Message and Privacy Policies.